dc.date.accessioned2018-11-23T20:43:01Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-22T21:26:44Z
dc.date.available2018-11-23T20:43:01Z
dc.date.available2023-03-22T21:26:44Z
dc.date.created2018-11-23T20:43:01Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier0235-2280
dc.identifier2193
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.filo.uba.ar/handle/filodigital/8454
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6264522
dc.description.abstractCanonical divisions of the history of philosophy usually present as drastic the break between Medieval and Modern thinking. One can genuinely ask whether that rupture has not started in the Middle Ages and to what extent many of the elements that characterise the Modernity are already present in that period. In that sense, the article seeks to establish some similarities between Medieval and Modern thinking, particularly the aspects concerning the relationships between the ethical-political thinking of Duns Scotus and some ideas of Hobbes, that, after a detailed study reveal themselves as heirs of Medieval philosophical thinking.
dc.languagees
dc.languagespa
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourcePatristica et Mediaevalia
dc.source22
dc.subjectfilosofía medieval
dc.subjectfilosofía política
dc.subjectpolítica
dc.subjectDuns Escoto, Juan
dc.subjectHobbes, Thomas
dc.subjectpoder legislativo
dc.subjectleyes
dc.subjectley natural
dc.subjectética
dc.subjectreligión
dc.subjectAlta Edad Media
dc.titleLey y ley natural en Duns Escoto : ¿Hobbes lector de Escoto?
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución