dc.date.accessioned2018-11-23T20:43:01Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-22T21:26:44Z
dc.date.available2018-11-23T20:43:01Z
dc.date.available2023-03-22T21:26:44Z
dc.date.created2018-11-23T20:43:01Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier0235-2280
dc.identifier2192
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.filo.uba.ar/handle/filodigital/8453
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6264521
dc.description.abstractMarsilius of Padua's theory of popular sovereignty has been up to the date widely disputed. Despite the restrictive connotations of the concept of 'weightier part' (valentior pars), the article seeks especially to point out the presence of a line of argumentation in the Defensor pacis, by means of which the universitas civium or valentior pars (insofar as they constitute the source of the legitimate political authority) are both understood in a widely inclusive sense. However, the historical projection and the political application of those theoretic concepts led in the facts to an emphasis on the unity and concentration of the legitimated power.
dc.languagees
dc.languagespa
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourcePatristica et Mediaevalia
dc.source22
dc.subjectfilosofía medieval
dc.subjectfilosofía política
dc.subjectpolítica
dc.subjectMarsilio de Padua
dc.subjectDefensor pacis, Marsilio de Padua
dc.subjectpoder legislativo
dc.subjectsoberanía
dc.subjectconsenso
dc.subjectEdad Media
dc.titleMarsilio de Padua y la teoría de la soberanía popular
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución