dc.date.accessioned2018-11-23T19:37:35Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-22T20:51:00Z
dc.date.available2018-11-23T19:37:35Z
dc.date.available2023-03-22T20:51:00Z
dc.date.created2018-11-23T19:37:35Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier0590-1901
dc.identifier1305
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.filo.uba.ar/handle/filodigital/7307
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6263375
dc.description.abstractIn this article, I intend to show that the Davidsonean defense of attribution holism implies, by virtue of certain assumptions of the theory of radical interpretation, a defense of semantic holism. The paper is divided into three main parts. First of all, I introduce the main different conceptions of both semantic holism and localism. Then, I present what I take to be the main theses of Davidson's semantic theory, in order to point to the significant role played by the holistic constraint. Finally, I conclude that the theory in question may be considered a clear instance not only of attribution holism but mainly of semantic holism.
dc.languagees
dc.languagespa
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceCuadernos de Filosofía
dc.source46
dc.subjectholismo
dc.subjectinterpretación de textos
dc.subjectsignificado
dc.subjectlenguaje
dc.subjectsemántica
dc.subjectDavidson, Donald
dc.titleInterpretación radical y holismo semántico
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución