dc.creatorGiaccio, Gustavo Carlos María
dc.creatorSaez, Juliana M.
dc.creatorEstévez, María C.
dc.creatorSalinas, Bárbara
dc.creatorCorral, Raúl Alejandro
dc.creatorDe Geronimo, Eduardo
dc.creatorAparicio, Virginia Carolina
dc.creatorÁlvarez, Analía
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-29T12:48:12Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T14:19:54Z
dc.date.available2022-12-29T12:48:12Z
dc.date.available2023-03-15T14:19:54Z
dc.date.created2022-12-29T12:48:12Z
dc.date.issued2022-12
dc.identifier0304-3894
dc.identifier1873-3336
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130675
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/13760
dc.identifierhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304389422024712
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6216679
dc.description.abstractGlyphosate (Gly) and its principal degradation product, the aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) were found in soils from a riparian environment in Argentina. Sixty-five actinobacteria were isolated from these soils, rhizosphere, and plants (Festuca arundinacea and Salix fragilis). The isolate Streptomyces sp. S5 was selected to be used as bioinoculant in a greenhouse test, in which plants, actinobacteria, and their combinations were assessed to bioremediate the riparian soil. The dissipation of both compounds were estimated. All treatments dissipated similarly the Gly, reaching 87-92% of dissipation. AMPA, dissipation of 38% and 42% were obtained by Salix and Festuca, respectively, while they increased to 57% and 70% when the actinobacterium was added to each planted system. Regarding the total dissipation, the higher efficiencies for both compounds were achieved by the non-planted soils bioaugmented with the actinobacterium, with 91% of Gly dissipated and 56% for AMPA. According to our study, it could be suggested which strategy could be applied depending on the bioremediation type needed. If in situ bioremediation is necessary, the combination of phytoremediation and actinobacteria bioaugmentation could be convenient. On the other hand, if ex situ bioremediation is needed, the inoculation of the soil with an actinobacterium capable to dissipate Gly and AMPA could be the more efficient and easier alternative.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relationinfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PD-E2-I039-002/2019-PD-E2-I039-002/AR./REMEDIACIÓN DE SUELOS Y AGUAS Y RESTAURACIÓN ECOLÓGICA DE SISTEMAS DEGRADADOS POR USO AGROPECUARIO, AGROINDUSTRIAL Y ACTIVIDADES EXTRACTIVAS
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.sourceJournal of Hazardous Materials : 130675 (Available online 25 December 2022)
dc.subjectGlifosato
dc.subjectBiodecontaminación
dc.subjectPlantas
dc.subjectGlyphosate
dc.subjectBioremediation
dc.subjectPlants
dc.subjectActinobacillus
dc.subjectRiparian Environments
dc.titleDeveloping a glyphosate-bioremediation strategy using plants and actinobacteria: potential improvement of a riparian environment
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución