dc.creatorCeddia, M. Graziano
dc.creatorMontani, Rodrigo
dc.creatorMioni, Walter Fernando
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-29T16:47:37Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T14:18:00Z
dc.date.available2022-09-29T16:47:37Z
dc.date.available2023-03-15T14:18:00Z
dc.date.created2022-09-29T16:47:37Z
dc.date.issued2022-08
dc.identifier1862-4065
dc.identifier1862-4057
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01203-1
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/13013
dc.identifierhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11625-022-01203-1
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6215947
dc.description.abstractThe critical impact of humans on the biosphere has led scientists to coin the term Anthropocene. The global environmental changes associated with it are happening under the aegis of capitalism. A transition towards sustainability requires a critical scrutiny of capitalism. The social–ecological system (SES) approach conceptualises the relationship between the socio-economic subsystem and the biosphere. However, in its various operationalisations it either treats the former as a black box or it fails to capture dynamic aspects. We address these limits and develop a Dialectical Socio-Ecological System (D-SES) framework, which combines process ecology with historical materialism, to describe the emergence and persistence of capitalist dynamics. We draw on data collected through fieldwork and desk research and deploy our framework to study capital-intensive agriculture in the Chaco Salteño, an important agricultural frontier in South America, obtaining some general insights. We open up the socio-economic subsystem and break it down into a lower-level material/economic sphere and an upper-level cultural/institutional sphere. Capitalist dynamics emerge out of the peculiar relationships occurring both within and between these spheres. This configuration shows the typical signs of autocatalysis. It attracts resources and capital to expand itself (centripetality). It becomes more complex and organised over time, fine-tuning production modes, cultures, and institutions (directionality). It is subject to the laws of competition and profit maximisation, which emerge independently from the individual actors and processes making up the system (autonomy). Finally, it engenders frictions, reflecting class antagonism between the direct producers and the appropriators of wealth. These frictions can become leverage points for a system’s transformation.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceSustainability Science (Published: 20 August 2022)
dc.subjectAgricultura
dc.subjectEcología
dc.subjectSistemas Socioculturales
dc.subjectMedio Ambiente
dc.subjectEntorno Socioeconómico
dc.subjectAgriculture
dc.subjectEcology
dc.subjectSociocultural Systems
dc.subjectEnvironment
dc.subjectSocioeconomic Environment
dc.titleThe dialectics of capital: learning from Gran Chaco
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución