dc.creatorLombardi, Banira
dc.creatorOrden, Luciano
dc.creatorVarela, Patricio
dc.creatorGaray, Maximiliano
dc.creatorIocoli, Gastón Alejandro
dc.creatorMontenegro, Agustín Rodrigo
dc.creatorSáez-Tovar, José
dc.creatorBustamante, María Ángeles
dc.creatorJuliarena, María Paula
dc.creatorMoral, Raúl
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-06T13:47:28Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T14:17:25Z
dc.date.available2022-09-06T13:47:28Z
dc.date.available2023-03-15T14:17:25Z
dc.date.created2022-09-06T13:47:28Z
dc.date.issued2022-08
dc.identifier2076-2615
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ani12162025
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/12789
dc.identifierhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/12/16/2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6215756
dc.description.abstractThe reuse of effluents from intensive dairy farms combined with localized irrigation techniques (fertigation) has become a promising alternative to increase crop productivity while reducing the environmental impact of waste accumulation and industrial fertilizers production. Currently, the reuse of dairy effluents through fertigation by subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) systems is of vital importance for arid regions but it has been poorly studied. The present study aimed to assess the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, soil properties, and crop yield of a maize crop fertigated with either treated dairy effluent or dissolved granulated urea applied through an SDI system at a normalized N application rate of 200 kg N ha−1. Fertilizer application was divided into six fertigation events. GHG fluxes were measured during fertigation (62-day) using static chambers. Soil properties were measured previous to fertilizer applications and at the harvest coinciding with crop yield estimation. A slight increase in soil organic matter was observed in both treatments for the 20–60 cm soil depth. Both treatments also showed similar maize yields, but the dairy effluent increased net GHG emissions more than urea during the fertigation period. Nevertheless, the net GHG emissions from the dairy effluent were lower than the theoretical CO2eq emission that would have been emitted during urea manufacturing or the longer storage of the effluent if it had not been used, showing the need for life-cycle assessments. Local-specific emission factors for N2O were determined (0.07%), which were substantially lower than the default value (0.5%) of IPCC 2019. Thus, the subsurface drip irrigation systems can lead to low GHG emissions, although further studies are needed.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relationinfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PD-E2-I518-002/2019-PD-E2-I518-002/AR./Estudio del impacto ambiental, gestión y tratamiento de residuos y efluentes sobre sistemas agropecuarios y agroindustriales para su valorización agronómica
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceAnimals 12 (16) : 2025 (August 2022)
dc.subjectEfluentes
dc.subjectIndustria Lechera
dc.subjectMaíz
dc.subjectFertirrigación
dc.subjectZona Semiárida
dc.subjectMedio Ambiente
dc.subjectMetano
dc.subjectEffluents
dc.subjectDairy Industry
dc.subjectMaize
dc.subjectFertigation
dc.subjectSemiarid Zones
dc.subjectEnvironment
dc.subjectMethane
dc.titleIs Dairy Effluent an Alternative for Maize Crop Fertigation in Semiarid Regions? An Approach to Agronomic and Environmental Effects
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución