dc.creatorFerre, Luis Bernardo
dc.creatorMalik, Genoveva
dc.creatorAller Atucha, Juan Florencio
dc.creatorAlberio, Ricardo
dc.creatorFresno, Cristóbal
dc.creatorKjelland, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-11T17:18:25Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T14:12:12Z
dc.date.available2021-11-11T17:18:25Z
dc.date.available2023-03-15T14:12:12Z
dc.date.created2021-11-11T17:18:25Z
dc.date.issued2015-09-09
dc.identifier0921-4488
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2015.08.016
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/10753
dc.identifierhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921448815300523
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6213715
dc.description.abstractAdult male Llamas (Lama glama) (n = 6) were collected using a receptive female and a thermo-electric artificial vagina assembled with a polyethylene collection bag with the following objectives: (a) to develop a reliable and repeatable semen collection technique for Llama, (b) validate semen evaluation tests for Llama, and (c) to determine the effect of collection frequency and season on Llama semen characteristics. First, the semen and sperm variables were recorded and validated through their own repeatability. Semen collection intervals tested were: 1X/week for three weeks and 3X/week for another three weeks, the second collection period occurring after two weeks of sexual rest. The collection frequency of 3X/week significantly reduced (P < 0.05) the sperm viability, motility, concentration, Total Sperm/Ejaculate, Total Motile Sperm/Ejaculate and Total Live Sperm/Ejaculate, but improved Total Sperm/Week and Total Live Sperm/Week. All recorded variables were significantly higher during the summer in comparison to the spring with the exception of morphology abnormalities, volume, and viability. Also, the 1X/week versus the 3X/week semen collection frequencies did not produce a significant difference in the percent of total motile sperm/week. Based on semen and sperm characteristics evaluated herein, Llama semen collected in the summer was better (P < 0.05), with regard to the majority of the variables analyzed, than semen collected in the spring.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.sourceSmall Ruminant Research 133 : 140-147 (december 2015)
dc.subjectLlama
dc.subjectEyaculación
dc.subjectRecolección de Semen
dc.subjectEvaluación
dc.subjectEspermatozoo
dc.subjectEstacionalidad
dc.subjectLlamas
dc.subjectEjaculation
dc.subjectSemen Collection
dc.subjectEvaluation
dc.subjectSpermatozoa
dc.subjectSeasonality
dc.titleLlama (Lama glama) semen collection via thermo-electric artificial vagina: effect of seasonality and collection interval on ejaculate characteristics
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución