dc.creatorPortela, Silvina Isabel
dc.creatorAndriulo, Adrian Enrique
dc.creatorSasal, Maria Carolina
dc.creatorMary, Bruno
dc.creatorJobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-29T10:33:33Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T14:11:17Z
dc.date.available2021-09-29T10:33:33Z
dc.date.available2023-03-15T14:11:17Z
dc.date.created2021-09-29T10:33:33Z
dc.date.issued2006-11-07
dc.identifier0032-079X
dc.identifier1573-5036
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-006-9134-z
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/10382
dc.identifierhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11104-006-9134-z
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6213332
dc.description.abstractNitrogen (N) export from soils to streams and groundwater under the intensifying cropping schemes of the Pampas is modest compared to intensively cultivated basins of Europe and North America; however, a slowNenrichment of water resources has been suggested. We (1) analyzed the fate of fertilizer N and (2) evaluated the contribution of fertilizer and soil organic matter (SOM) to N leaching under the typical cropping conditions of the Pampas. Fertilizer N was applied as 15N-labeled ammonium sulfate to corn (in a corn/soybean rotation) sown under zero tillage in filled-in lysimeters containing two soils of different texture representative of the Pampean region (52 and 78 kg N ha-1, added to the silt loam and sandy loam soil, respectively). Total fertilizer recovery at corn harvest averaged 84 and 64% for the silt loam and sandy loam lysimeters, respectively. Most fertilizer N was removed with plant biomass (39%) or remained immobilized in the soil (29 and 15%, for the silt loam and sandy loam soil, respectively) whereas its loss through drainage was negligible (<0.01%).We presume that the unaccounted fertilizer N losses were related to volatilization and denitrification. Throughout the corn growing season, subsequent fallow and soybean crop, which took place during an exceptionally dry period, the fertilizer N immobilized in the organic pool remained stable, and N leaching was scarce (7.5 kg N ha-1), similar at both soils, and had a low contribution of fertilizer N (0–3.5%), implying that >96% of the leached N was derived fromSOMmineralization. The inherent highSOM of Pampean soils and the favorable climatic conditions are likely to propitiate year-round production of nitrate, favoring its participation in crop nutrition and leaching. The presence of 15N in drainage water, however, suggests that fertilizer N leaching could become significant in situations with higher fertilization rates or more rainy seasons.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relationinfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/PNSUELO-1134042/AR./Aprovechamiento de residuos para aumentar el reciclado en el suelo. Sumideros de carbono y emisiones del suelo.
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.sourcePlant and Soil 289 : 265–277 (2006)
dc.subjectMaize
dc.subjectSoil Organic Matter
dc.subjectLysimeters
dc.subjectNitrogen Fertilizers
dc.subjectLeaching
dc.subjectNitrogen
dc.subjectZea mays
dc.subjectMaíz
dc.subjectMateria Orgánica del Suelo
dc.subjectLisimetros
dc.subjectAbonos Nitrogenados
dc.subjectLixiviación
dc.subjectNitrógeno
dc.titleFertilizer vs. organic matter contributions to nitrogen leaching in cropping systems of the Pampas: 15N application in field lysimeters
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución