dc.creatorMas-Coma, Santiago
dc.creatorCafrune Wierna, María Mercedes
dc.creatorFunatsu, Ilra Renata
dc.creatorMangold, Atilio José
dc.creatorAngles, Rene
dc.creatorBuchon, Paola
dc.creatorFantozzi, Maria Cecilia
dc.creatorArtigas, Patricio
dc.creatorValero, Maria Adela
dc.creatorBargues, Maria Dolores
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-17T14:06:35Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T14:11:09Z
dc.date.available2021-09-17T14:06:35Z
dc.date.available2023-03-15T14:11:09Z
dc.date.created2021-09-17T14:06:35Z
dc.date.issued2021-09
dc.identifier2076-2615
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092693
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/10291
dc.identifierhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/9/2693
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6213281
dc.description.abstractSouth American camelids are definitive hosts of Fasciola hepatica. However, their capacity to participate in the transmission and epidemiology of fascioliasis has never been appropriately studied. Therefore, an F. hepatica isolate from Argentine llama is for the first time analyzed using Galba truncatula lymnaeids from Bolivia. Experimental follow-up studies included egg embryogenesis, miracidial infection of lymnaeid snails, intramolluscan larval development, cercarial production, chronobiology of cercarial shedding, vector survival to infection, and metacercarial infectivity of mammal host. Shorter prepatent and patent periods were leading to markedly lower cercarial production, shorter cercarial shedding, and a higher negative impact on snail survival. The usually low liver fluke prevalences and intensities and low daily fecal outputs indicate that llamas do not substantially contribute to fascioliasis transmission. The defecating behavior in dung piles far from freshwater collections prevents lymnaeid infection by eggs shed by this camelid. All results suggest the reservoir role of the llama to be negligible and, therefore, no priority within control measures in endemic areas. However, llamas may play a disease-spreading role if used as pack animals in rural areas. In the Northern Bolivian Altiplano human hyperendemic area, neither llamas nor alpacas should be considered for control measures within a One Health action.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceAnimals 11 (9) : 2693. (September 2021)
dc.subjectLlama
dc.subjectEnfermedades de los Animales
dc.subjectFascíolosis
dc.subjectVectores
dc.subjectFasciola hepatica
dc.subjectEpidemiología
dc.subjectLlamas
dc.subjectAnimal Diseases
dc.subjectFasciolasis
dc.subjectVectors
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.titleFascioliasis in Llama, Lama glama, in Andean Endemic Areas: Experimental Transmission Capacity by the High Altitude Snail Vector Galba truncatula and Epidemiological Analysis of Its Reservoir Role
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución