dc.creatorGargaglione, Veronica Beatriz
dc.creatorPeri, Pablo Luis
dc.creatorBahamonde, Héctor Alejandro
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-29T11:11:22Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T14:09:42Z
dc.date.available2021-06-29T11:11:22Z
dc.date.available2023-03-15T14:09:42Z
dc.date.created2021-06-29T11:11:22Z
dc.date.issued2017-08-21
dc.identifierGARGAGLIONE V.; PERI P.L.; BAHAMONDE H. (2017) 15N uptake and distribution in grasses growing under Nothofagus antarctica vs. grasses in an open site. Proceedings XVIII International Plant Nutrition Colloquium - IPNC 2017, pp. 2-4. University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 21-24 August 2017.
dc.identifier978-87-996274-0-0
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/9679
dc.identifierhttp://www.ipnc2017.org/the-proceedings-book
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6212680
dc.description.abstractIn Argentinean Patagonia, there is an extensive area from 36º 30´ to 56º 00´SL where Nothofagus antarctica (ñire) native forests are distributed in a narrow strip being the main use as silvopastoral system. In these systems, understory vegetation (composed mainly by grasses) is grazed mainly for cattle and sheep (Peri & Ormaechea 2013). Next to the N. antarctica forest, in the ecotone zone, there are grasslands also used for extensive sheep or cattle production with many grass species in common with understory forest species. Likewise, as nitrogen is usually a limiting nutrient in most of the ecosystems, we aimed to know how grasses utilize and distribute available N when they are growing in open areas or close to trees. It is known that trees may compete for resources, but they may also increase soil fertility, microbialactivity orimprove water availabilityby reducing water loss from evapotranspiration inshade (i.e.Mordeletand Le Roux 2006; Simmons et al. 2008). The aim of this work was to study 15N uptake and distribution in grasses growing in undertory N. antarctica trees compared with grasses growing in an open grassland. We hipotethized that in these austral ecosystems, when water may be limiting owing to strong summer winds, grasses under trees could better absorb and assimilate the available N than grasses growing in open landscapes.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversity of Copenhagen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceProceedings XVIII International Plant Nutrition Colloquium - IPNC 2017, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 21-24 August 2017. p. 2-4.
dc.subjectNothofagus
dc.subjectSistemas Silvopascícolas
dc.subjectPastizales
dc.subjectNitrógeno
dc.subjectIsotopos
dc.subjectRecursos
dc.subjectSilvopastoral Systems
dc.subjectPastures
dc.subjectNitrogen
dc.subjectIsotopes
dc.subjectResources
dc.title15N uptake and distribution in grasses growing under Nothofagus antarctica vs. grasses in an open site
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/documento de conferencia
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución