dc.creatorMaldonado, Luis Maria
dc.creatorMarcinkevicius, Karenina
dc.creatorBorelli, Romina Soledad
dc.creatorGennari, Gerardo Pablo
dc.creatorSalomon, Virginia María
dc.creatorIsla, María Inés
dc.creatorVera, Nancy Roxana
dc.creatorBorelli, Valeria Soledad
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-24T15:47:57Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T13:59:57Z
dc.date.available2019-05-24T15:47:57Z
dc.date.available2023-03-15T13:59:57Z
dc.date.created2019-05-24T15:47:57Z
dc.date.issued2018-09
dc.identifier1658-077X
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2018.09.003
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/5206
dc.identifierhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1658077X18303825
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6208365
dc.description.abstractBees collect vegetal resins that they mix with their wax and mechanical impurities to elaborate propolis, whose chemical composition is complex and variable depending on botanical/geographical origin, type of bee, time of year when it was produced and function in the hive. The presence of compounds that absorb UV radiation, such as those of the phenolic type: acids, esters, flavonoids and chalcones, largely responsible for their antioxidant, antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory biological activity has been reported. The objective of the present work was to establish if it was possible to differentiate Argentine propolis using UV spectroscopy and chemometric analysis, in the following cases: (a) Propolis elaborated by three different species of bees (Apis mellifera, Tetragonisca fiebrigi, Scaptotrigona jujuyensis) of the same geographical origin, and (b) Propolis produced by a species of bee (Apis mellifera) of four different geographical origins. UV spectrograms were performed in the 190–420 nm range for all the samples followed by analysis of principal components, hierarchical clusters and linear discriminants. The results showed that Argentine propolis could be differentiated in the two cases studied, and that A. mellifera, T. fiebrigi and S. jujuyensis would not use the same plant species to produce them.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceJournal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences online 22 September 2018
dc.subjectPropóleos
dc.subjectApicultura
dc.subjectProductos de la Colmena
dc.subjectAbeja Melífera
dc.subjectDiferencias Biológicas
dc.subjectEspectroscopia
dc.subjectArgentina
dc.subjectPropolis
dc.subjectApiculture
dc.subjectHive Products
dc.subjectHoney Bees
dc.subjectBiological Differences
dc.subjectSpectroscopy
dc.titleDifferentiation of argentine propolis from different species of bees and geographical origins by UV spectroscopy and chemometric analysis
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución