dc.creatorLupi, Leonardo
dc.creatorBedmar, Francisco
dc.creatorPuricelli, Marino Marcelo
dc.creatorMarino, Damián
dc.creatorAparicio, Virginia Carolina
dc.creatorWunderlin, Daniel
dc.creatorMiglioranza, Karina S.B.
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-06T14:42:42Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T13:59:35Z
dc.date.available2019-05-06T14:42:42Z
dc.date.available2023-03-15T13:59:35Z
dc.date.created2019-05-06T14:42:42Z
dc.date.issued2019-06
dc.identifier0045-6535
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.03.090
dc.identifierhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653519305260
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/5042
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6208190
dc.description.abstractGlyphosate-based products are among the most important herbicides applied to enhance the production of food commodities, leading to the worldwide spread of this herbicide. The main goal of this work was to evaluate the off-site transport of glyphosate in a runoff experiment. A micro-plot experiment was conducted to assess the retention, leaching and runoff of glyphosate under rainfall simulation. Glyphosate losses due to spray drift were estimated. Concentrations of glyphosate and AMPA were determined in rainwater and subsurface soil from agricultural and riparian zones. Analyses were performed with UHPLC-MS/MS. Experimental results demonstrated that 88.1% of the applied glyphosate was retained in the surface soil layer (0–9 cm). Glyphosate leaching was negligible compared to its runoff (3.9%) and spray drift (6.9%). Thus, the risk of groundwater pollution would be lower in comparison to that of both surface waters and rainwater. Moreover, under field conditions, glyphosate and AMPA were detected in 52% of the rainwater samples and glyphosate was detected up to 1 m in both soil profiles. Although the experimental application was made with hand-held knapsack under low wind condition to minimize glyphosate aerial dispersion, the spray drift was the main source of glyphosate off-site transport, degrading air quality and rainwater for human consumption. The balance among spray drift, runoff and soil absorption of glyphosate when it was sprayed close to the soil surface (hand held equipment), demonstrated the importance of spray drift in mass balance studies during runoff and leaching experiments with glyphosate.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.sourceChesmosphere 225 : 906-914 (June 2019)
dc.subjectSuelo
dc.subjectGlifosato
dc.subjectAgua de Escorrentía
dc.subjectAgua de Lluvia
dc.subjectExperimentación en Campo
dc.subjectArgentina
dc.subjectSoil
dc.subjectGlyphosate
dc.subjectRunoff Water
dc.subjectRainwater
dc.subjectField Experimentation
dc.titleGlyphosate runoff and its occurrence in rainwater and subsurface soil in the nearby area of agricultural fields in Argentina
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución