dc.creatorAcreche, Martin Moises
dc.creatorPortocarrero, Rocio
dc.creatorChalco Vera, Jorge Elias
dc.creatorDanert, Fátima Carolina
dc.creatorValeiro, Alejandro Hector
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-31T15:27:34Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T13:55:59Z
dc.date.available2018-08-31T15:27:34Z
dc.date.available2023-03-15T13:55:59Z
dc.date.created2018-08-31T15:27:34Z
dc.date.issued2014-06
dc.identifier0972-1525
dc.identifier0974-0740
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-013-0270-5
dc.identifierhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12355-013-0270-5
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/3270
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6206519
dc.description.abstractConcentrations of greenhouse gases (GHG) in the atmosphere are increasing due to anthropogenic actions, and agriculture is one of the most important contributors. This study quantified GHG emissions from green-cane harvested sugarcane with and without post-harvest burning in Tucumán (Argentina). A field trial was conducted in Tucumán during the 2011/2012 season using a randomised complete-block design with four replications. Treatments were: (a) harvest without sugarcane burning (neither before nor after), and (b) harvest with trash burnt after harvest. The method used to capture gases (CO2, CH4 and N2O) in the crop cycle was based on closed-vented chambers, while quantification was by gas chromatography. There were significant emission rates of CO2 and N2O during the sugarcane cycle in Tucumán, but no evidence of CH4 emissions or uptakes. N2O and CO2 emission rates were higher in the no-burning treatment than in the burnt, but only in part of the crop cycle. The former is apparently associated with the application of nitrogen fertiliser, while the higher CO2 emissions seem to be associated with trash retention. There were no significant correlations between environmental factors and emission rates. Although these results seem pessimistic, in the context of an entire crop GHG balance (including the emissions due to burning before or after harvest) green-cane harvesting without burning could effectively lead to a reduction of total GHG emissions during the crop cycle.
dc.languageeng
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.sourceSugar Tech 16 (2) : 195–199 (June 2014)
dc.subjectCaña de Azúcar
dc.subjectGases de Efecto Invernadero
dc.subjectTecnología Postcosecha
dc.subjectDióxido de Carbono
dc.subjectEmisiones de Metano
dc.subjectSugarcane
dc.subjectGreenhouse Gases
dc.subjectPostharvest Technology
dc.subjectCarbon Dioxide
dc.subjectMethane Emission
dc.titleGreenhouse Gas Emissions from Green-Harvested Sugarcane With and Without Post-harvest Burning in Tucumán, Argentina
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución