dc.creatorRotolo, Gloria Claudia
dc.creatorFrancis, C.A.
dc.creatorCraviotto, Roque Mario
dc.creatorViglia, S.
dc.creatorPereyra, A.
dc.creatorUlgiati, Sergio
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-29T14:32:06Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T13:54:25Z
dc.date.available2018-05-29T14:32:06Z
dc.date.available2023-03-15T13:54:25Z
dc.date.created2018-05-29T14:32:06Z
dc.date.issued2015-03
dc.identifier1574-9541
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2014.05.002
dc.identifierhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S157495411400048X
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2507
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6205776
dc.description.abstractSeeds of major crop cultivars provide a vital genetic and cultural link from one human generation to the next. Information embodied in seed is essential to continuity of food production, adaptation to changing climate, and evolution of human society. Introduction of transgenic (GMO) technologies simplifies management, appears profitable for seed companies and farmers, and promotes efficient industrialization of agriculture, although there is ongoing debate about potential of GMO varieties to increase genetic yield potential. Although short-term profits are one measure of success, there are other methods to evaluate long-term sustainability that are not accounted for in the market place. Emergy analysis accounts for biophysical, economic, environmental and information costs in seed production. It was used to calculate resource demand of GMO seed development and production for sale to farmers and to explore the direct and indirect environmental costs for storing new information. This includes initial transformation through testing to commercial seed production, and emphasizes environmental accounting. Maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) seed production in Argentina are used to evaluate the GMO breeding strategy. We used our calculations for conventional hybrids and varieties as well as emergy evaluation of crop production from literature as references. Analysis of the GMO process was divided into a) identification and isolation of a desired gene and transfer into another genome; b) transfer of the chosen trait into a selected commercial line of maize or variety of soybean; and c) trials for adaptation and seed multiplication to obtain commercial products for sale to farmers. Comparable emergy used for conventional hybrids and varieties comes from steps b) and c). Results from step c) showed a low reliance of the GMO process on renewable resources (8%–12%); a lower or similar efficiency in converting input resources into the desired output compared to non-GMO crop production from other studies and our estimates from conventional seed production; and a high contribution from services (indirect labor, around 70% of total emergy). The resource investments for using, extracting and transforming available information of present GMO strategies are not commensurate with achieved results, and may increase due to unanticipated ecosystem reactions over the long term due to a continuous rebound effect.
dc.languageeng
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.sourceEcological Informatics 26, Part 1 : 35-49. (March 2015)
dc.subjectAgricultura
dc.subjectInnovación
dc.subjectOrganismos Modificados Genéticamente
dc.subjectCultivos
dc.subjectMedio Ambiente
dc.subjectAgriculture
dc.subjectInnovation
dc.subjectGenetically Modified Organisms
dc.subjectCrops
dc.subjectEnvironment
dc.titleTime to re-think the GMO revolution in agriculture
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución