dc.contributorAzevedo, Marco Antonio Oliveira de
dc.creatorRodrigues Filho, Márcio Francisco
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-28T18:50:52Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-09T21:25:49Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-13T22:28:57Z
dc.date.available2015-04-28T18:50:52Z
dc.date.available2022-09-09T21:25:49Z
dc.date.available2023-03-13T22:28:57Z
dc.date.created2015-04-28T18:50:52Z
dc.date.created2022-09-09T21:25:49Z
dc.date.issued2014-08-12
dc.identifierhttp://148.201.128.228:8080/xmlui/handle/20.500.12032/31644
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6194146
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation is an analytical study of two very influential conceptions of consciousness in contemporary philosophy of mind. The main focus of this research is twofold. First, it intends to describe both John Searle's and Daniel Dennett approach on consciousness, and, second, to expose Searle's criticism to Dannett's functionalist approach. Both approaches will be described and evaluated, and the relevant differences between these two authors will be put in contrast. In not providing a concept that includes the qualitative characteristic of consciousness, it will be argued that Dennett's functionalism cannot explain human conscious experiences. His philosophy of mind also cannot solve the problem of other minds, since the concept of consciousness exposed by Dennett does not differentiate conscious human beings from unconscious zombies.
dc.publisherUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectConsciência
dc.subjectConsciousness
dc.titleA consciência inexplicada: as críticas de Searle ao funcionalismo de Dennett
dc.typeDissertação


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución