dc.contributorStein, Sofia Inês Albornoz
dc.creatorVentura, Pedro Paulo Ramos
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-24T11:08:18Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-22T19:18:59Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-13T21:13:37Z
dc.date.available2015-11-24T11:08:18Z
dc.date.available2022-09-22T19:18:59Z
dc.date.available2023-03-13T21:13:37Z
dc.date.created2015-11-24T11:08:18Z
dc.date.created2022-09-22T19:18:59Z
dc.date.issued2015-09-29
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12032/59447
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/6180651
dc.description.abstractThe general objectof this dissertation is to investigate the nature of inductive reasoning based on the analysis of David Hume about inductive inferences, which depend, for him, on the human ability to establish inferences from principles of human nature. The reasoning concerning the cause and effect notions are founded on experience (and on our natural ability to perceive similarities, contiguity, and being familiarized to what appears to us as a constant conjunction). On the other hand, Stuart Mill develops in his book A System of Logic (1960) - ((1900)), the five methods of induction that would become known as Mill’s Methods. The role of inductive reasoning capacity will be the guideline of this dissertation. This paper aims to examine Stuart Mill’s proposal of inductive rationality, as well asunderstand if the induction is a rational inference, determine what kind of rationality is behind the induction and explain the various inductive inferences that Mill presents, through his examples. The main purpose is to perform a contrast between the distinction that Hume established between ideas, instincts, habits, similarity, contiguity, causality and inference and Mill’s inductive methods.
dc.publisherUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectLógica
dc.subjectLogic
dc.titleA racionalidade indutiva: em que consiste?
dc.typeDissertação


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución