dc.creator | Poquet Catalá, Raquel (1) | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-01-30T09:12:07Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-07T19:20:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-01-30T09:12:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-03-07T19:20:06Z | |
dc.date.created | 2019-01-30T09:12:07Z | |
dc.identifier | 23868090 | |
dc.identifier | https://reunir.unir.net/handle/123456789/7730 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5902320 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this work it is studied, from a point of view of both judicial and scientific doctrine, the case completed in the paragraph f) art. 115.2 LGSS, whose not concise wording has given rise to a long debate, because in this an illness is legally considered as work accident. Hence, it is also known as work disease and their constitutive elements have been subject of a wide judicial interpretation and not always easy to set up. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | Trabajo y Derecho | |
dc.relation | ;nº 18 | |
dc.relation | http://boletinsumarios.ccoo.es/revista/154/ | |
dc.rights | restrictedAccess | |
dc.subject | deterioration | |
dc.subject | previous disease | |
dc.subject | work accident | |
dc.subject | work disease | |
dc.subject | worker | |
dc.subject | Scopus | |
dc.title | The problematic qualification of previous pathologies as work accident | |
dc.type | Articulo Revista Indexada | |