dc.contributor | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) | |
dc.contributor | Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) | |
dc.contributor | Universidade de São Paulo (USP) | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-30T16:20:28Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-20T14:52:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-11-30T16:20:28Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-12-20T14:52:41Z | |
dc.date.created | 2022-11-30T16:20:28Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-08-02 | |
dc.identifier | European Journal Of Prosthodontics And Restorative Dentistry. Lowestoft: Dennis Barber Ltd, 7 p., 2022. | |
dc.identifier | 0965-7452 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/237948 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1922/EJPRD_2281Commar07 | |
dc.identifier | WOS:000835544800001 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5418002 | |
dc.description.abstract | This in-situ study aimed to evaluate the chromatic stability, microhardness, and surface free energy of chemicaly activated acrylic resin (CAAR) samples. Eighty CAAR samples were made and each volunteer (n = 20) received two palatal plates with two sides of groups (without and with glaze application). The samples were exposed to two conditions: the control condition (sucrose 30%) and the test condition (sucrose 30% and 0.12% chlorhexidine). The volunteers used the first palatal device (control condition) for seven days and the second palatal device (test condition) for another seven days, with a seven-day break between them. Then, the Delta E-00 , microhardness, and surface-free energy tests were performed. Analysis of Variance and the Tukey test were used (alpha = 0.05). The control group with glaze showed higher Delta E-00 compared to the group without the glaze. The test group with glaze had less Delta E-00 than their respective controls. In both periods, when the glaze was applied, higher microhardness values were found for al groups. Groups with glaze showed lower roughness and higher surface-free energy than groups without the glaze. The values obtained in this study were satisfactory, showing the clinical efficacy of glaze and the use of 0.12% CH for maintaining the physical and mechanical properties of CAAR. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | Dennis Barber Ltd | |
dc.relation | European Journal Of Prosthodontics And Restorative Dentistry | |
dc.source | Web of Science | |
dc.subject | Hardness | |
dc.subject | Surface Property | |
dc.subject | Acrylic Resin | |
dc.subject | Temporary Dental Restorations | |
dc.title | Influence of Light-Curing Glaze and Chlorhexidine Gluconate in the Acrylic Resin Properties: An in situ Study | |
dc.type | Artículos de revistas | |