dc.contributorABC Medical School
dc.contributorSão Lucas Research and Education Institute (IEP-Sao Lucas)
dc.contributorHospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributorPR
dc.contributorUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-29T08:46:33Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-20T03:18:03Z
dc.date.available2022-04-29T08:46:33Z
dc.date.available2022-12-20T03:18:03Z
dc.date.created2022-04-29T08:46:33Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.identifierInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, v. 16, p. 3561-3574.
dc.identifier1178-2005
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/231607
dc.identifier10.2147/COPD.S332613
dc.identifier2-s2.0-85123459802
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5411741
dc.description.abstractBackground and Objectives: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by the destruction of alveolar walls, chronic inflammation and persistent respiratory symptoms. There is no curative clinical treatment for COPD. In this context, cell-based therapy is a promising therapeutic alternative for COPD. Thus, in this open, controlled and randomized Phase I Clinical Trial, we aimed to assess the safety of the infusion of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMC), adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (ADSC) and, especially, the safety of concomitant infusion (co-infusion) of BMMC and ADSC as a new therapeutic alternative for COPD. The rationale for co-infusion of BMMC and ADSC is based on the hypothesis of an additive or synergistic therapeutic effect resulting from this association. Methods: To achieve the proposed objectives, twenty patients with moderate-to-severe COPD were randomly divided into four groups: control group - patients receiving conventional treatment; BMMC group - patients receiving only BMMC; ADSC group - patients receiving only ADSC, and co-infusion group - patients receiving the concomitant infusion of BMMC and ADSC. Patients were assessed for pulmonary function, biochemical profile, and quality of life over a 12 months follow-up. Results: No adverse events were detected immediately after the infusion of BMMC, ADSC or co-infusion. In the 12-month follow-up, no causal relationship was established between adverse events and cell therapy procedures. Regarding the efficacy, the BMMC group showed an increase in forced expiratory volume (FEV1) and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO). Co-infusion group showed a DLCO, and gas exchange improvement and a better quality of life. Conclusion: The results obtained allow us to conclude that cell-based therapy with co-infusion of BMMC and ADSC is a safe procedure and a promising therapeutic for COPD. However, additional studies with a greater number of patients are needed before randomized and controlled Phase III clinical trials can be implemented.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectcell therapy
dc.subjectco-infusion
dc.subjectconcomitant infusion
dc.subjectCOPD
dc.subjectmesenchymal stem cells
dc.subjectstem cells
dc.titleAutologous Infusion of Bone Marrow and Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Phase I Randomized Clinical Trial
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución