dc.contributorRegional Laboratories Center Bauru
dc.contributorRegional Laboratories Center Presidente Prudente
dc.contributorScience and Technology of Triângulo Mineiro
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributorCentral Laboratory
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-29T08:39:51Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-20T03:03:31Z
dc.date.available2022-04-29T08:39:51Z
dc.date.available2022-12-20T03:03:31Z
dc.date.created2022-04-29T08:39:51Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-01
dc.identifierJournal of Applied Microbiology.
dc.identifier1365-2672
dc.identifier1364-5072
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/230416
dc.identifier10.1111/jam.15470
dc.identifier2-s2.0-85124843368
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5410550
dc.description.abstractAims: To evaluate the physicochemical and microbiological quality of dialysis water and dialysate samples from haemodialysis centres. Methods and Results: Samples were fortnightly collected from three haemodialysis centres in Bauru City, Brazil, between July 2017 and June 2018, at the stages of post-reverse osmosis, reuse and dialysate. Analyses included determination of conductivity, fluoride, nitrate and sulphate; test for total coliform bacteria; count of heterotrophic bacteria; count and identification of non-fermenting gram-negative bacilli (NFGNB); drug susceptibility test; biofilm formation capacity; and genetic similarity among some isolated NFGNB. Of the analysed samples, only 4/72 (5.6%) had conductivity values ≥10 mS/cm, 4/216 (1.9%) presented total coliforms and 1/216 (0.5%) had heterotrophic bacteria count >100 CFU/ml. NFGNB were isolated from 99/216 (45.8%) samples, and the major identified micro-organisms included Herbaspirillum aquaticum/huttiense, Brevundimonas aurantiaca, Cupriavidus metallidurans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Ralstonia insidiosa. Isolates of P. aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia complex were sensitive to most antimicrobials and, together with isolates of Ralstonia insidiosa and Ralstonia pickettii, showed strong biofilm formation capacity. Some isolates expressed the same electrophoretic profile on pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, indicating the persistence of bacterial clones in the systems over time. Conclusions: NFGNB were observed in several dialysis water and dialysate samples from all investigated centres, which may represent a risk to the health of patients. Significance and Impact of the Study: Regular inclusion of actions for NFGNB control and monitoring in haemodialysis fluids are suggested for greater safety of the dialytic process.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationJournal of Applied Microbiology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectbiofilm
dc.subjectdialysate
dc.subjectdialysis water
dc.subjectgram-negative bacteria
dc.subjecthaemodialysis
dc.subjectsusceptibility test
dc.titleQuality of dialysis water and dialysate in haemodialysis centres: Highlight for occurrence of non-fermenting gram-negative bacilli
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución