dc.contributor | The Ohio State University | |
dc.contributor | Case Western Reserve University | |
dc.contributor | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) | |
dc.contributor | Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-04-29T08:38:53Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-20T03:01:59Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-04-29T08:38:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-12-20T03:01:59Z | |
dc.date.created | 2022-04-29T08:38:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-01-01 | |
dc.identifier | Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. | |
dc.identifier | 1097-6841 | |
dc.identifier | 0022-3913 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/230296 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.10.007 | |
dc.identifier | 2-s2.0-85123713292 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5410430 | |
dc.description.abstract | Statement of problem: Bonding to recently launched polymer-based computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) materials has been challenging. Evidence regarding etching strategies for dual-phase CAD-CAM materials is sparse, but adequate bonding is crucial for the clinical success and longevity of a restoration. Purpose: The purpose of this 2-part in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the effect of surface treatment strategies on the microshear bond strength and work of adhesion of polymer-based and ceramic materials. In addition, chemical elements present on the surface and the interface morphology after using those strategies were also assessed. Materials and methods: Two CAD-CAM polymer and 1 CAD-CAM ceramic materials were selected for this in vitro study. The materials were subjected to different surface treatment strategies, including airborne-particle abrasion and the application of 9% hydrofluoric acid. Specimens were submitted to microshear bond strength before and after thermocycling, and the failure mode was classified. The work of adhesion was calculated based on the water-to-air surface tension of 72.8 mN.m-1 and the Young- Dupré equation. The surfaces were submitted to energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and the interfaces were analyzed using a scanning electron microscope. Data were subjected to 2-way ANOVA and the Tukey post hoc test (α=.05). Results: The highest microshear bond strength means were observed for the polymer-based materials when hydrofluoric acid or airborne-particle abrasion was applied. The 3 materials tested showed a decrease in microshear bond strength after thermocycling, except for applying airborne-particle abrasion to 1 of the polymer-based material tested. The ceramic material tested showed a high microshear bond strength with the application of airborne-particle abrasion and hydrofluoric acid combined. The work of adhesion varied across the materials and presented high means when hydrofluoric acid was used. Conclusions: A combination of airborne-particle abrasion plus hydrofluoric acid should be considered for polymer-based or feldspathic ceramic CAD-CAM materials. In this in vitro study, both etching procedures combined produced higher bonding values for all materials tested. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.relation | Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.title | Different surface treatment strategies on etchable CAD-CAM materials: Part II—Effect on the bond strength | |
dc.type | Artículos de revistas | |