Pro-poor innovations to promote instrumental freedoms: A systematic literature review

dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-29T08:37:17Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-20T02:58:33Z
dc.date.available2022-04-29T08:37:17Z
dc.date.available2022-12-20T02:58:33Z
dc.date.created2022-04-29T08:37:17Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-01
dc.identifierSustainability (Switzerland), v. 13, n. 24, 2021.
dc.identifier2071-1050
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/230035
dc.identifier10.3390/su132413587
dc.identifier2-s2.0-85120961693
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5410169
dc.description.abstractThrough a systematic literature review, this article aims to evaluate the impacts of various concepts of pro-poor innovations (PPI) on the five instrumental freedoms in Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach. For this, 165 articles were analysed to summarize the main influences of the pro-poor innovation on each type of instrumental freedom: political freedoms, economic facilities, transparency guarantees, social opportunities, and protective security. In general, the results indicate a positive influence of the innovation concepts for distinct types of freedom, with emphasis on the expansion of social opportunities and economic facilities.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationSustainability (Switzerland)
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCapability approach
dc.subjectFrugal innovation
dc.subjectGrassroots innovation
dc.subjectHuman development
dc.subjectLiterature review
dc.subjectPro-poor innovation
dc.titlePro-poor innovations to promote instrumental freedoms: A systematic literature review
dc.typeOtros


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución