dc.contributor | Rodovia José Aurélio Vilela (BR 267) | |
dc.contributor | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) | |
dc.contributor | Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Norte | |
dc.contributor | São José Dos Campos | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-04-29T07:43:53Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-20T02:35:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-04-29T07:43:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-12-20T02:35:37Z | |
dc.date.created | 2022-04-29T07:43:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-06-13 | |
dc.identifier | Physical Review D, v. 93, n. 12, 2016. | |
dc.identifier | 2470-0029 | |
dc.identifier | 2470-0010 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/228174 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.124034 | |
dc.identifier | 2-s2.0-84976351870 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5408309 | |
dc.description.abstract | The equivalence between theories depending on the derivatives of R, i.e. f(R,R,...,nR), and scalar-multi-tensorial theories is verified. The analysis is done in both metric and Palatini formalisms. It is shown that f(R,R,...,nR) theories are equivalent to scalar-multi-tensorial ones resembling Brans-Dicke theories with kinetic terms ω0=0 and ω0=-32 for metric and Palatini formalisms respectively. This result is analogous to what happens for f(R) theories. It is worth emphasizing that the scalar-multi-tensorial theories obtained here differ from Brans-Dicke ones due to the presence of multiple tensorial fields absent in the last. Furthermore, sufficient conditions are established for f(R,R,...,nR) theories to be written as scalar-multi-tensorial theories. Finally, some examples are studied and the comparison of f(R,R,...,nR) theories to f(R,□R,...,□nR) theories is performed. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.relation | Physical Review D | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.title | Scalar-multi-tensorial equivalence for higher order f (R,μR,μ1μ2R,...,μ1...μnR) theories of gravity | |
dc.type | Artículos de revistas | |