dc.contributorCentro de Ciências Agroveterinárias (CAV/UDESC)
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributorEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y de Montes (ETSIAM/UCO)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-29T06:01:22Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-20T02:21:30Z
dc.date.available2022-04-29T06:01:22Z
dc.date.available2022-12-20T02:21:30Z
dc.date.created2022-04-29T06:01:22Z
dc.date.issued2012-01-01
dc.identifierChilean Journal of Agricultural Research, v. 72, n. 2, p. 182-187, 2012.
dc.identifier0718-5839
dc.identifier0718-5820
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/227029
dc.identifier10.4067/S0718-58392012000200003
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84868588173
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5407164
dc.description.abstractGlyphosate is the main herbicide used in coffee (Coffea arabica L.) plantations in Brazil. Problems with herbicide drift commonly occur in orchard fields due to non-adequate spraying conditions. A series of experiments was carried out aiming to evaluate physiological dose-response of C. arabica plants submitted to exposure to simulated glyphosate drift in two distinct plant growth stages. Glyphosate was applied at 0, 180, 360, and 720 g acid equivalent (AE) ha-1 directly on coffee plants with 10 and 45 d after transplanting (DAT). Glyphosate doses in a range of 180-360 g AE ha-1 increased photosynthesis, transpiration and stomatal conductance in 10 DAT-plants up to 14 d after application (DAA) while, in 45 DAT-plants, an increase was observed only up to 2 DAA, but this pattern was not persistent afterwards so that no difference in gas exchange was observed at 60 DAA in both plants. Macronutrient content was not affected by glyphosate application in both plants. Plant DM accumulation was not affected by glyphosate application at 10 DAT-plants, but an increase in plant growth was observed when glyphosate was applied in a range of 360-720 g AE ha-1 in 45 DAT-plants. Coffea arabica cv. Catuaí Vermelho IAC-144 responded differentially to glyphosate drift depending on plant growth stage, regarding on photosynthesis, transpiration, stomatal conductance, and plant growth, in spite of macronutrient nutrition was not affected.
dc.languageeng
dc.languagespa
dc.relationChilean Journal of Agricultural Research
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCoffea arabica
dc.subjectHerbicide drift
dc.subjectN-(phosphonomethyl)glycine
dc.subjectPhotosynthesis
dc.subjectPlant nutrition
dc.titleRespuesta fisiológica de plantas de café (Coffea arabica L.) a glifosato depende de la etapa de crecimiento
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución