dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributorFlorida State University
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T19:49:24Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-20T01:34:20Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T19:49:24Z
dc.date.available2022-12-20T01:34:20Z
dc.date.created2022-04-28T19:49:24Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-01
dc.identifierWorld Development, v. 152.
dc.identifier1873-5991
dc.identifier0305-750X
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/223214
dc.identifier10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105768
dc.identifier2-s2.0-85122576517
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5403343
dc.description.abstractChild labor is a pernicious problem throughout the developing world, but conditional cash transfer programs (CCTs) could reduce the number of working children. We evaluate the effectiveness of CCTs at attenuating child labor based on our analysis of a massive administrative dataset on Brazil's applicants to social programs between 2001 and 2015. We use Multiples (twins, triplets, etc.) as an instrument for receiving the Bolsa Família stipend. Receiving the stipend does not offset the cost of an exogenous increase in family size, does not reduce child laborers’ participation in the workforce and does not improve educational outcomes for child laborers in households with Multiples births. Instead, contextual and familial factors appear to shape program efficacy in mitigating this troubling practice.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationWorld Development
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectChild labor
dc.subjectConditional cash transfers
dc.subjectDeveloping world
dc.subjectPoverty
dc.titleConditional cash transfers and child labor
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución