dc.contributorSports Science School of Rio Maior–Polytechnic Institute of Santarém
dc.contributorLife Quality Research Centre
dc.contributorUniversity of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro
dc.contributorHealth Sciences and Human Development
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributorLargo dos Colegiais
dc.contributorInstituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo
dc.contributorDelegação da Covilhã
dc.contributorUniversity of Granada
dc.contributorUniversity of Extremadura
dc.contributorUniversity of Mohaghegh Ardabili
dc.contributorSepahan Football Club
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T19:47:53Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-20T01:31:23Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T19:47:53Z
dc.date.available2022-12-20T01:31:23Z
dc.date.created2022-04-28T19:47:53Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-01
dc.identifierInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 18, n. 23, 2021.
dc.identifier1660-4601
dc.identifier1661-7827
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/222984
dc.identifier10.3390/ijerph182312817
dc.identifier2-s2.0-85120620918
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5403113
dc.description.abstractThe internal intensity monitoring in soccer has been used more in recent years in men’s football; however, in women’s soccer, the existing literature is still scarce. The aims of this study were threefold: (a) to describe the weekly variations of training monotony, training strain and acute: chronic workload ratio through session Rated Perceived Exertion (s-RPE); (b) to describe weekly variations of Hooper Index [stress, fatigue, Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness (DOMS) and sleep]; and (c) to compare those variations between playing positions and player status. Nineteen players (24.1 ± 2.7 years) from a Portuguese BPI League professional team participated in this study. All variables were collected in a 10-week in-season period with three training sessions and one match per week during the 2019/20 season. Considering the overall team, the results showed that there were some associations between Hooper Index categories and s-RPE like stress or fatigue (0.693, p < 0.01), stress or DOMS (0.593, p < 0.01), stress or s-RPE (−0.516, p < 0.05) and fatigue or DOMS (0.688, p < 0.01). There were no differences between all parameters in playing positions or player status. In conclusion, the study revealed that higher levels of fatigue and DOMS occur concurrently with better nights of sleep. Moreover, any in-season variations concerning internal load and perceived wellness seems independent of position or status in outfield players. The data also showed that the higher the players’ reported stress, the lower the observed s-RPE, thus possibly indicating a mutual interference of experienced stress levels on the assimilation of training intensity by elite women soccer players.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectFatigue
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectMuscle soreness
dc.subjectPerceived exertion
dc.subjectSleep
dc.subjectStress
dc.subjectTraining monotony
dc.subjectTraining strain
dc.titleIn-season internal load and wellness variations in professional women soccer players: Comparisons between playing positions and status
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución