dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T19:40:18Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-20T01:15:36Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T19:40:18Z
dc.date.available2022-12-20T01:15:36Z
dc.date.created2022-04-28T19:40:18Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.identifierAnimal Nutrition.
dc.identifier2405-6383
dc.identifier2405-6545
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/221763
dc.identifier10.1016/j.aninu.2021.01.004
dc.identifier2-s2.0-85107180465
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5401893
dc.description.abstractIn the last few years, feed additives have been used in animal nutrition to improve nutrient utilization, health parameters and animal performance. However, the use of antibiotics as feed additives has allowed the occurrence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), which can bring as a consequence, an increase in the morbidity and mortality of diseases that were previously treatable with antibiotics. In this context, antimicrobial peptides (AMP) have appeared as a promising strategy because they have multiple biological activities and represent a powerful strategy to prevent the development of resistant microorganisms. Despite the small number of studies applied in vivo, AMP appear as a potent alternative to the use of antibiotics in animal nutrition, due to an increase in feed efficiency and the prevention/treatment of some animal diseases. This review discusses the problems associated with antimicrobial resistance and the use of AMP as a strong candidate to replace conventional antibiotics, mainly in the animal industry.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationAnimal Nutrition
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAdditive
dc.subjectAntimicrobial peptide
dc.subjectBroiler
dc.subjectCattle
dc.subjectLaying hen
dc.subjectPig
dc.titleAntimicrobial peptides as a feed additive alternative to animal production, food safety and public health implications: An overview
dc.typeOtros


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución