Cutting ability of the flexofile instrument in resin simulated canals

Capacidad de corte de la lima flexofile en canales simulados

dc.contributorUniversidad Taubaté
dc.contributorUniversidad Taubaté. Director Clínico
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributorUniversidade de Taubaté
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T19:27:44Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-20T01:10:34Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T19:27:44Z
dc.date.available2022-12-20T01:10:34Z
dc.date.created2022-04-28T19:27:44Z
dc.date.issued2008-01-01
dc.identifierRevista Cubana de Estomatologia, v. 45, n. 1, p. 1-2, 2008.
dc.identifier1561-297X
dc.identifier0034-7507
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/221352
dc.identifier2-s2.0-85071840280
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5401481
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this investigation was to compare cutting ability of a Flexofile instruments in substrate phenolic resin simulated canals blocks before and after the root canal preparation using two techniques, one were a hand instrumentation technique and the other, a engine-driven rotatory motion (Endo-Gripper). Twenty simulated canals manufactured in resin blocks were divided two groups, the first one hand technique (G1) and the second one, a rotatory motion instrumentation (G2) being the blocks weight difference of the groups before and after the instrumentation. The results were showed no statistically significant differences between the two types of instrumentation techniques (manual and rotatory) regarding the cutting ability (p=0,05).
dc.languageeng
dc.relationRevista Cubana de Estomatologia
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDental instruments
dc.subjectEndodontics
dc.subjectInstrumentation
dc.subjectMethods
dc.titleCutting ability of the flexofile instrument in resin simulated canals
dc.titleCapacidad de corte de la lima flexofile en canales simulados
dc.typeOtros


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución