dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T18:57:59Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-20T00:52:03Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T18:57:59Z
dc.date.available2022-12-20T00:52:03Z
dc.date.created2022-04-28T18:57:59Z
dc.date.issued2012-08-20
dc.identifierRA'E GA - O Espaco Geografico em Analise, n. 24, p. 92-107, 2012.
dc.identifier1516-4136
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/219822
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84865015490
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5399951
dc.description.abstractThe National Curricular Parameters (PCN) for primary school were introduced in 1998 within other deep educational changes promoted by the Brazilian State. In the field of Geography there have been heated discussions about the propositions put in this document as far as failures and gaps from a theoretical, methodological and didactical-pedagogical points of view are concerned. While some authors argue about its authoritarian character, others support its propositons stating that there is the need for a national curricular orientation. However, the PCN are now a reference for the teaching of Geography in Brazil subsidizing school plannings and assessment system. Hence, the need for a reflection on the effective connetion between teachers and the PCN is verified, i.e., the PCN consequences in the school teaching practice must be taken into consideration. In this text, we intend to work on some questions which might contribute to that.
dc.languagepor
dc.relationRA'E GA - O Espaco Geografico em Analise
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCurricular propositions
dc.subjectGeography
dc.subjectPCN
dc.subjectTeacher
dc.subjectTeaching
dc.titleProfessores e parâmetros curriculares nacionais (PCN): Como está essa relação?
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución