dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-14T10:21:14Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-19T23:13:53Z
dc.date.available2021-07-14T10:21:14Z
dc.date.available2022-12-19T23:13:53Z
dc.date.created2021-07-14T10:21:14Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-25
dc.identifierEngenharia Agrícola. Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola, v. 41, n. 3, p. 311-318, 2021.
dc.identifier0100-6916
dc.identifier1809-4430
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/211231
dc.identifier10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v41n3p311-318/2021
dc.identifierS0100-69162021000300311
dc.identifierS0100-69162021000300311.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5391784
dc.description.abstractThe productivity of a crop is related to the water demand inserted in its development. The measurement of water and its optimization directly influences the final costs of crop production for agricultural producers. In this sense, the objective of this study is evaluating the fuzzy modeling in estimating the productivity of the radish crop (fresh phytomass of the tuberous root) affected by different irrigation depths (25%, 50%, 75%, 100%, and 125%), based on evapotranspiration of the crop (ETc). To measure the results, two fuzzy systems (with triangular and Gaussian membership functions respectively) and a polynomial regression model were developed to perform model validation comparisons. The fuzzy modeling showed a better fit of the data compared to the polynomial regression model, with reduced errors (RMSE with values 6.3 and 6.9 in the fuzzy models versus 8.8 in the regression model) and higher correlation coefficient (0.54 and 0.5 fuzzy versus 0.1 regression). The triangular fuzzy model estimated the best crop yield (31.9 g of fresh phytomass) when using a 100% ETc depth. Also, the curve generated by the fuzzy model accurately represents all the productivity averages in each depth, in addition to this model presenting the smallest errors (compared to the triangular model and the regression model) and the highest R2. However, the Gaussian fuzzy model proved to be more efficient in representing the agronomic reality, as it does not have peaks and valleys, and it is a smooth model in both growth and degrowth.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherAssociação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola
dc.relationEngenharia Agrícola
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceSciELO
dc.subjectwater optimization
dc.subjectfuzzy logic
dc.subjecttuberous
dc.subjectGaussian
dc.titleFUZZY MODELING OF THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION DEPTHS ON THE RADISH CROP. PART I: PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución