| dc.contributor | Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar) | |
| dc.contributor | Universidade de São Paulo (USP) | |
| dc.contributor | Univ Bern | |
| dc.contributor | Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-25T15:20:11Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-19T23:04:38Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-06-25T15:20:11Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-12-19T23:04:38Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2021-06-25T15:20:11Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-04-01 | |
| dc.identifier | Journal Of Dentistry. Oxford: Elsevier Sci Ltd, v. 107, 7 p., 2021. | |
| dc.identifier | 0300-5712 | |
| dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/210426 | |
| dc.identifier | 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103612 | |
| dc.identifier | WOS:000636793800011 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5391026 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Objective: This study investigated the mechanism of action of different proteins/peptides (separately or in combination), focusing on how they act directly on the native enamel surface and on modifying the salivary pellicle. Methods: A total of 170 native human enamel specimens were prepared and submitted to different treatments (2 h; 37 degrees C): with deionized water, CaneCPI-5, Hemoglobin, Statherin, or a combination of all three proteins/peptides. The groups were subdivided into treatment acting on the enamel surface (NoP - absence of salivary pellicle), and treatment modifying the salivary pellicle (P). Treatment was made (2 h; 37 degrees C) in all specimens, and later, for P, the specimens were incubated in human saliva (2 h; 37 degrees C). In both cases, the specimens were immersed in 1% citric acid (pH 3.6; 2 min; 25 degrees C). Calcium released from enamel (CaR) and its relative surface reflection intensity (%SRI) was measured after 5 cycles. Between-group differences were verified with two-way ANOVA, with presence of pellicle and treatment as factors (alpha = 0.05). Results: The presence of pellicle provided better protection regarding %SRI (p < 0.01), but not regarding CaR (p = 0.201). In relation to treatment, when compared to the control group, all proteins/peptides provided significantly better protection (p < 0.01 for %SRI and Car). The combination of all three proteins/peptides demonstrated the best protective effect (p < 0.01 for %SRI). Conclusion: Depending on the protein or peptide, its erosion-inhibiting effect derives from their interaction with the enamel surface or from modifying the pellicle, so a combination of proteins and peptides provides the best protection. Clinical significance: The present study opens a new direction for a possible treatment with a combination of proteins for native human enamel, which can act directly on the enamel surface as well on the modification of the salivary pellicle, for the prevention of dental erosion. | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier B.V. | |
| dc.relation | Journal Of Dentistry | |
| dc.source | Web of Science | |
| dc.subject | Acquired pellicle | |
| dc.subject | Dental erosion | |
| dc.subject | Enamel | |
| dc.subject | Protein | |
| dc.subject | Pellicle modification | |
| dc.subject | saliva | |
| dc.title | Acquired pellicle engineering with proteins/peptides: Mechanism of action on native human enamel surface | |
| dc.type | Artículos de revistas | |