dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorNIOO KNAW
dc.contributorFed Univ Jatai
dc.contributorARS
dc.contributorAgron Inst Campinas IAC
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T12:31:15Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-19T22:57:41Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T12:31:15Z
dc.date.available2022-12-19T22:57:41Z
dc.date.created2021-06-25T12:31:15Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-01
dc.identifierField Crops Research. Amsterdam: Elsevier, v. 261, 12 p., 2021.
dc.identifier0378-4290
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/209849
dc.identifier10.1016/j.fer.2020.108008
dc.identifierWOS:000604576900004
dc.identifier9790998212635563
dc.identifier0000-0003-1854-2927
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5390446
dc.description.abstractIntercropping upland rice with forage grasses is a potential strategy for enhancing the sustainability of agriculture in the tropical region by increasing food production, land use per unit area, nitrogen (N) cycling, and profitability. However, little is known about the appropriate N management and N use efficiency of upland rice in these complex systems. Thus, our aim was to verify the feasibility of intercropping upland rice with tropical forage grasses combined with different N management applications at sowing and sidedressing. A field experiment was carried out in three growing seasons with three intercropping systems (monocropped upland rice, upland rice intercropped with palisade grass, and upland rice intercropped with guinea grass) combined with six N applications to upland rice [0-0 (control), 100-0, 80-20, 50-50, 20-80, and 0-100 kg N ha(-1) at sowingsidedressing]. Dry matter (DM) and accumulated N were measured in upland rice and forage grasses. In addition, components of rice yield production, industrial yield, production cost, land equivalent ratio, relative N yield, relative crowding coefficient, aggressivity of upland rice with forage grasses, forage crude protein (CP) concentration, estimated animal stocking rate, and estimated meat production were determined. Despite competition between rice and forage grasses, intercropping systems had superior benefits in terms of production and land use per unit area, N cycling, and profitability compared with monoculture. Forage DM production, CP, estimated animal stocking rate, and estimated meat production increased when N fertilizer was applied at sidedressing to rice (20-80, 50-50 and 0-100 kg N ha(-1)). Rice intercropped with guinea grass produced a greater amount of biomass, indicating that this forage species may be more advantageous in tropical regions. Net profit, total aboveground biomass, total N content, land equivalent ratio, and relative N yield were greater in intercropping systems fertilized with N.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relationField Crops Research
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectOryza sativa L.
dc.subjectBrachiaria spp.
dc.subjectMegathyrsus maximus
dc.subjectIntercropping crops
dc.subjectSustainable agroecosystem
dc.titleUpland rice intercropped with forage grasses in an integrated crop-livestock system: Optimizing nitrogen management and food production
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución