Borsuk-Ulam theorem for filtered spaces
dc.contributor | Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) | |
dc.contributor | Universidade de São Paulo (USP) | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-25T10:50:47Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-19T22:26:22Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-25T10:50:47Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-12-19T22:26:22Z | |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-25T10:50:47Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-03-01 | |
dc.identifier | Forum Mathematicum, v. 33, n. 2, p. 419-426, 2021. | |
dc.identifier | 1435-5337 | |
dc.identifier | 0933-7741 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/207211 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1515/forum-2019-0291 | |
dc.identifier | 2-s2.0-85100150157 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5387808 | |
dc.description.abstract | Let X and Y be pathwise connected and paracompact Hausdorff spaces equipped with free involutions T:X→X and S:Y→Y, respectively. Suppose that there exists a sequence (Xi,Ti)→ hi (Xi+1,Ti+1) for 1≤i≤k, where, for each i, Xi is a pathwise connected and paracompact Hausdorff space equipped with a free involution Ti, such that Xk+1=X, and hi:Xi→Xi+1 is an equivariant map, for all 1≤i≤k. To achieve Borsuk-Ulam-type theorems, in several results that appear in the literature, the involved spaces X in the statements are assumed to be cohomological n-acyclic spaces. In this paper, by considering a more wide class of topological spaces X (which are not necessarily cohomological n-acyclic spaces), we prove that there is no equivariant map f:(X,T)→(Y,S) and we present some interesting examples to illustrate our results. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.relation | Forum Mathematicum | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | Borsuk-Ulam theorems | |
dc.subject | equivariant maps | |
dc.subject | filtered spaces | |
dc.subject | involutions | |
dc.title | Borsuk-Ulam theorem for filtered spaces | |
dc.type | Artículos de revistas |