dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorUniversity of South Florida
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T10:13:31Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-19T22:03:39Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T10:13:31Z
dc.date.available2022-12-19T22:03:39Z
dc.date.created2021-06-25T10:13:31Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.identifierWaste Management, v. 119, p. 226-234.
dc.identifier1879-2456
dc.identifier0956-053X
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/205329
dc.identifier10.1016/j.wasman.2020.08.041
dc.identifier2-s2.0-85092720227
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5385927
dc.description.abstractThis study analyzed the environmental impacts of nine scenarios for Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) bottle waste disposal, in the city of Bauru, Brazil. Nine scenarios were considered in this study: (1) current (base) scenario (96.4% of PET waste is sent to landfill, 3.6% is sent to sorting cooperatives); (2) 50% to sorting cooperatives, 50% to landfill; (3) 50% to sorting cooperatives, 50% to incineration; (4) 50% to landfill, 50% to incineration; (5) 100% to sorting cooperatives (keeping the current collection distribution); (6) 100% to landfill; (7) 100% to incineration; (8) and (9) 100% sent to sorting cooperatives, with changes in the collection scheme. Life cycle assessment was implemented to compute the impacts for each scenario and compare their environmental performances. The results have shown that recycling is a better option than incineration across all impact categories analyzed. Landfilling had lower net impacts than incineration in all categories, except for ozone depletion and freshwater eutrophication. All recycling scenarios proposed outperformed the current scenario in all impact categories. Even though recycling presents itself as an environmentally-promising alternative, much work still needs to be done for its successful implementation, such as promoting source-separation at home and improving the management strategies of recycling cooperatives, including additional funding and training to support an increased sorting capacity.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationWaste Management
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectIncineration
dc.subjectLandfilling
dc.subjectLife cycle assessment
dc.subjectPolyethylene Terephthalate (PET) waste
dc.subjectRecycling
dc.titleLife cycle comparative assessment of pet bottle waste management options: A case study for the city of Bauru, Brazil
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución