dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-12T02:39:33Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-19T21:19:41Z
dc.date.available2020-12-12T02:39:33Z
dc.date.available2022-12-19T21:19:41Z
dc.date.created2020-12-12T02:39:33Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01
dc.identifierJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, v. 11, n. 12, p. 969-977, 2019.
dc.identifier1989-5488
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/201700
dc.identifier10.4317/JCED.56002
dc.identifier2-s2.0-85083522349
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5382334
dc.description.abstractBackground: Endocrown restorations as a conservative approach to restore endodontically treated teeth still need an in vitro investigation under fatigue at different materials. This study evaluated the effect of restorative material and restoration thickness on the maximum fracture load of endocrowns subjected to cyclic loading. Material and Methods: Sixty (60) third molar teeth received an endocrown preparation with three different heights of remaining dental tissue (1.5, 3.0 or 4.5 mm). A leucite-based ceramic (LEU) and a lithium disilicate (LD) based ceramic were selected to manufacture the CAD/CAM endocrown restorations, totaling 6 groups (n=10). The specimens were subjected to fatigue loading (200N, 2 x 106 cycles, water) and then to the single load to failure test (1 mm/min crosshead speed). Data were analyzed by using two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (p < 0.05). Results: All endocrowns survived the fatigue test. The thickness did not influence the restoration's fracture load (p=0.548) instead the restorative material (p=0.003). LD showed higher mean values (1714.43 N)A than LEU (1313.47 N)B. Conclusions: Endocrowns manufactured with CAD/CAM lithium disilicate blocks showed superior fracture load than the leucite-based blocks after mechanical fatigue. Nevertheless, both materials presented acceptable survival and fracture load as long as the material's minimum thickness and the enamel adhesion are respected.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCAD/CAM
dc.subjectEndocrown
dc.subjectEndodontically treated teeth
dc.subjectFailure load
dc.subjectMinimal intervention dentistry
dc.titleThe impact of restorative material and ceramic thickness on CAD\CAM endocrowns
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución