dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorPetróleo Brasileiro S.A. – Petrobras
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-12T02:30:27Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-19T21:15:27Z
dc.date.available2020-12-12T02:30:27Z
dc.date.available2022-12-19T21:15:27Z
dc.date.created2020-12-12T02:30:27Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01
dc.identifierLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), v. 11896 LNCS, p. 751-760.
dc.identifier1611-3349
dc.identifier0302-9743
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/201356
dc.identifier10.1007/978-3-030-33904-3_71
dc.identifier2-s2.0-85075696640
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5381990
dc.description.abstractMost Convolutional Neural Networks make use of subsampling layers to reduce dimensionality and keep only the most essential information, besides turning the model more robust to rotation and translation variations. One of the most common sampling methods is the one who keeps only the maximum value in a given region, known as max-pooling. In this study, we provide pieces of evidence that, by removing this subsampling layer and changing the stride of the convolution layer, one can obtain comparable results but much faster. Results on the gait recognition task show the robustness of the proposed approach, as well as its statistical similarity to other pooling methods.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectConvolutional Neural Networks
dc.subjectDeep learning
dc.subjectGait recognition
dc.titleDoes Pooling Really Matter? An Evaluation on Gait Recognition
dc.typeActas de congresos


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución