Ideias no lugar: Senhora, de JosÉ de Alencar

dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-12T02:30:13Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-19T21:15:20Z
dc.date.available2020-12-12T02:30:13Z
dc.date.available2022-12-19T21:15:20Z
dc.date.created2020-12-12T02:30:13Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01
dc.identifierAlea: estudos neolatinos, v. 21, n. 3, p. 49-63, 2019.
dc.identifier1807-0299
dc.identifier1517-106X
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/201347
dc.identifier10.1590/1517-106X/20192134963
dc.identifierS1517-106X2019000300049
dc.identifier2-s2.0-85075467274
dc.identifierS1517-106X2019000300049.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5381981
dc.description.abstractThis article establishes a debate with Roberto Schwarz's concept of “misplaced ideas”, stemming from the analysis of the novel Senhora, by José de Alencar. Some implications and theoretical-critical consequences of the dialectical method applied to the analysis of literature are discussed, in order to clarify the reading that José de Alencar's novel would not have been able to explore, in a formal context, the structuring potentialities of the represented social content. Through a dialogue with the rigidity of the macrosociological approach, and choosing the same comparative method with the solutions found by Machado de Assis in Helena (1876), Memórias Póstumas de Brás Cubas (1881) and Dom Casmurro (1899), this article proposes that, in Senhora, the ideas are not “misplaced,” but occupying their place in a socioeconomic structure in transition.
dc.languagepor
dc.relationAlea: estudos neolatinos
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAnother place for ideas
dc.subjectJosé de Alencar
dc.subjectMachado de Assis
dc.subjectMiplaced ideas
dc.subjectSenhora
dc.title(Mis)placed ideas: Senhora, by José de Alencar
dc.titleIdeias no lugar: Senhora, de JosÉ de Alencar
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución