dc.contributorNorwegian University of Science and Technology
dc.contributorUniversity of Helsinki
dc.contributorUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de Alfenas
dc.contributorIPÊ – Instituto de Pesquisas Ecológicas
dc.contributorTexas Tech University
dc.contributorMuseum of Texas Tech University
dc.contributorUniversity of Miami
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-12T01:46:49Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-19T20:55:47Z
dc.date.available2020-12-12T01:46:49Z
dc.date.available2022-12-19T20:55:47Z
dc.date.created2020-12-12T01:46:49Z
dc.date.issued2020-02-01
dc.identifierDiversity and Distributions, v. 26, n. 2, p. 154-168, 2020.
dc.identifier1472-4642
dc.identifier1366-9516
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/199696
dc.identifier10.1111/ddi.13010
dc.identifier2-s2.0-85075359083
dc.identifier4158685235743119
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5380330
dc.description.abstractAim: Forest fragmentation is among the principal causes of global biodiversity loss, yet how it affects mutualistic interactions between plants and animals at large spatial scale is poorly understood. In particular, tropical forest regeneration depends on animal-mediated seed dispersal, but the seed-dispersing animals face rapid decline due to forest fragmentation and defaunation. Here, we assess how fragmentation influences the pairwise interactions between 407 seed disperser and 1,424 tree species in a highly fragmented biodiversity hotspot. Location: Atlantic Forest, South America. Methods: We predicted interaction networks in 912 sites covering the entire biome by combining verified interaction data with co-occurrence probabilities obtained from a spatially explicit joint species distribution model. We identified keystone seed dispersers by computing a species-specific keystone index and by selecting those species belonging to the top 5% quantile. Results: We show that forest fragmentation affects seed dispersal interactions negatively, and the decreased area of functionally connected forest, rather than increased edge effects, is the main driver behind the loss of interactions. Both the seed disperser availability for the local tree communities and in particular the proportion of interactions provided by keystone seed dispersers decline with increasing degree of fragmentation. Importantly, just 21 keystone species provided >40% of all interactions. The numbers of interactions provided by keystone and non-keystone species, however, were equally negatively affected by fragmentation, suggesting that seed dispersal interactions may not be rewired under strong fragmentation effects. Conclusions: We highlight the importance of understanding the fragmentation-induced compositional shifts in seed disperser communities as they may lead to lagged and multiplicative effects on tree communities. Our results illustrate the utility of model-based prediction of interaction networks as well as model-based identification of keystone species as a tool for prioritizing conservation efforts. Similar modelling approaches could be applied to other threatened ecosystems and interaction types globally.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationDiversity and Distributions
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAtlantic Forest
dc.subjectco-occurrence
dc.subjectecological network
dc.subjectfragmentation
dc.subjectfrugivory
dc.subjectHierarchical Modelling of Species Communities
dc.subjectjoint species distribution model
dc.subjectkeystone species
dc.subjectseed dispersal
dc.subjectzoochory
dc.titleFragmented tropical forests lose mutualistic plant–animal interactions
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución