dc.contributorUniv Montreal
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorLudwig Inst Canc Res
dc.contributorUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributorMcGill Univ
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-10T20:09:16Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-19T20:26:04Z
dc.date.available2020-12-10T20:09:16Z
dc.date.available2022-12-19T20:26:04Z
dc.date.created2020-12-10T20:09:16Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01
dc.identifierJournal Of Medical Microbiology. London: Microbiology Soc, v. 69, n. 7, p. 960-970, 2020.
dc.identifier0022-2615
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/197197
dc.identifier10.1099/jmm.0.001213
dc.identifierWOS:000560642600007
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5377835
dc.description.abstractIntroduction. Persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 infection is the main causal agent of cervical cancer. Most HPV infections clear spontaneously within 1-2 years. Although not all infected women develop detectable HPV antibodies, about 60-70% seroconvert and retain their antibodies at low levels. Aim. We investigated if cervical HPV16 DNA positivity was associated with HPV16 seroreactivity measured with two different antigen formulations. We assessed if associations were influenced by co-infection with other HPV types and HPV16 viral load. Methodology. We used baseline data for women participating in the Ludwig-McGill cohort, a longitudinal investigation of the natural history of HPV infection and cervical neoplasia. The study enrolled 2462 Brazilian women from 1993 to 1997 (pre-vaccination). ELISA assays were based on L1-only or L1+L2 virus-like particles (VLPs). Seroreactivity was expressed as normalized absorbance ratios. HPV genotyping and viral load were evaluated by PCR protocols. Pearson's r was used to measure correlations between interval-scaled variables. Serological accuracy in HPV16 DNA detection was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. We analysed the association between HPV DNA positivity and HPV16 seroreactivity by linear regression. Results. Correlations between L1+L2 and L1-only VLPs for detection of HPV16 were poor (r=0.43 and 0.44 for dilutions 1 :10 and 1:50, respectively). The protocol with the best accuracy was L1+L2 VLPs at serum dilution 1: 10 (ROC area=0.73, 95% CI: 0.65-0.85). HPV16 DNA positivity was correlated with HPV16 seroreactivity and was not influenced by co-infection or viral load. To a lesser degree, HPV16 seroreactivity was correlated with infection by other Alpha-9 papillomavirus species. Conclusion. HPV16 DNA positivity and HPV16 seroreactivity are strongly correlated. L1+L2 VLPs perform better than L1-only VLPs for detecting IgG antibodies to HPV16 in women infected with HPV16 or other Alpha-9 HPV species. This study advances our understanding of humoral immune responses against HPV16 by providing insights about the influence of VLP antigen composition to measure humoral immune response against naturally acquired HPV infection.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherMicrobiology Soc
dc.relationJournal Of Medical Microbiology
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectELISA
dc.subjectHuman papillomavirus
dc.subjectHPV16 seroreactivity
dc.subjectIgG antibodies
dc.subjectnatural infection
dc.subjectvirus-like particles
dc.titleCorrelation between cervical HPV DNA detection and HPV16 seroreactivity measured with L1-only and L1+L2 viral capsid antigens
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución