dc.contributor | Univ Juiz de Fora UFJF | |
dc.contributor | Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) | |
dc.contributor | Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-12-10T16:55:32Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-19T19:56:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-12-10T16:55:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-12-19T19:56:57Z | |
dc.date.created | 2020-12-10T16:55:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011-01-01 | |
dc.identifier | Xi Brazilian Power Electronics Conference (cobep 2011). New York: Ieee, p. 858-863, 2011. | |
dc.identifier | 2175-8603 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/194819 | |
dc.identifier | WOS:000395311200132 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5375456 | |
dc.description.abstract | Maximum Power Point tracking (MPPT) in photovoltaic (PV) systems may be achieved by controlling either the voltage or current of the PV device. There is no consensus in the technical literature about how is the best choice. This paper provides a comparative analysis performance among current and voltage control using two different MPPT strategies: the perturb and observe (P&O) and the incremental conductance techniques. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | Ieee | |
dc.relation | Xi Brazilian Power Electronics Conference (cobep 2011) | |
dc.source | Web of Science | |
dc.subject | photovoltaic system | |
dc.subject | maximum power point tracking | |
dc.subject | MPPT | |
dc.subject | current control | |
dc.subject | voltage control | |
dc.title | COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CURRENT AND VOLTAGE-CONTROLLED PHOTOVOLTAIC MAXIMUM POWER POINT TRACKING | |
dc.type | Actas de congresos | |