dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-06T17:07:41Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-19T19:04:52Z
dc.date.available2019-10-06T17:07:41Z
dc.date.available2022-12-19T19:04:52Z
dc.date.created2019-10-06T17:07:41Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01
dc.identifierInternational Journal of Environmental Studies.
dc.identifier1029-0400
dc.identifier0020-7233
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/190268
dc.identifier10.1080/00207233.2019.1594216
dc.identifier2-s2.0-85064506406
dc.identifier5444393509883072
dc.identifier0000-0002-4695-2678
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5371306
dc.description.abstractA rural producer who wishes to market organic products must obtain the Brazilian Organic Conformity Assessment System seal and consider a series of criteria for certification. The objective of this article is to identify which criteria should take priority and which organic conformity assessment mechanism (certification by Audit or by the Participatory Guarantee System—SPG) is the most appropriate option for a rural producer who wishes to obtain the seal of organic certification. After a bibliometric analysis, the researchers used the Analytic Hierarchy Process multicriteria method. A sensitivity analysis was also carried out to investigate variations in the priorities of the criteria and certification alternatives. The results indicated the following order of priority of the criteria: cost, market access, and producer availability. SPG was the most relevant assessment mechanism.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationInternational Journal of Environmental Studies
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectagriculture
dc.subjectAHP
dc.subjectcertification
dc.subjectdecision
dc.subjectOrganic
dc.subjectsmallholder
dc.titleApplication of multi-criteria decision-making methods: certification mechanisms for organic produce in Brazil
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución