Determinación del umbral glucémico individual con el uso de glucómetro portátil de farmacia;
Determinação do limiar glicêmico individual com o uso de glicosímetro portátil de farmácia

dc.contributorExercise Physiology and Measurements and Assessment Laboratory
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorUniversidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM
dc.contributorFaculdade de Ciências do Desporto e Educação Física
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-06T15:52:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-19T18:37:08Z
dc.date.available2019-10-06T15:52:23Z
dc.date.available2022-12-19T18:37:08Z
dc.date.created2019-10-06T15:52:23Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01
dc.identifierRevista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte, v. 25, n. 3, p. 207-210, 2019.
dc.identifier1517-8692
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/187953
dc.identifier10.1590/1517-869220192503153162
dc.identifierS1517-86922019000300207
dc.identifier2-s2.0-85070592692
dc.identifierS1517-86922019000300207.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5368991
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The individual glucose threshold (IGT) has been used to estimate the anaerobic threshold with low-cost analyses and shorter times. However, the reliability of the glycemic analysis using a portable pharmacy glucose meter has received little attention. Objective: To identify the IGT using a portable glucose meter and to compare it with the ventilatory threshold (VT). Methods: Fourteen active, healthy men (25.9 ± 3.2 years; %BF = 17.9 ± 3.7%) performed an incremental treadmill test. The anaerobic threshold was identified by two different methods: (1) IGT, corresponding to the intensity of the lowest glucose value during the test; and (2) VT, corresponding to the break in linearity of the ventilation curve and an increase in the respiratory oxygen equivalent, without an equivalent increase in carbon dioxide. Results: There were significant differences between VT (9.9 ± 1.2 km/h) and IGT (9.5 ± 1/1 km/h), corresponding to 75.4 ± 9.2 and 72.5 ± 10.4 %VO2max, respectively. The methods presented high correlation (r = 0.82, p = 0.002) and the Bland-Altman technique showed agreement between IGT and VT, with a mean difference of 0.5 km/h. Conclusion: It was possible to determine the intensity of IGT by the glycemic response in the incremental test using a portable glucose meter. The IGT underestimated the intensity of VT by approximately 0.5 km/h, but with a high correlation and agreement between them. Level of evidence III, Case-Controle Study.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationRevista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAnaerobic threshold
dc.subjectBlood glucose
dc.subjectVentilatory anaerobic threshold
dc.titleDetermination of individual glucose threshold using pharmacy portable blood glucose meter
dc.titleDeterminación del umbral glucémico individual con el uso de glucómetro portátil de farmacia
dc.titleDeterminação do limiar glicêmico individual com o uso de glicosímetro portátil de farmácia
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución