dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-05T05:46:01Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-19T18:20:02Z
dc.date.available2019-10-05T05:46:01Z
dc.date.available2022-12-19T18:20:02Z
dc.date.created2019-10-05T05:46:01Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01
dc.identifierGrassland Science. Hoboken: Wiley, v. 65, n. 1, p. 3-12, 2019.
dc.identifier1744-6961
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/186550
dc.identifier10.1111/grs.12215
dc.identifierWOS:000454610400001
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5367588
dc.description.abstractWe conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the impact of Lactobacillus plantarum or Lactobacillus buchneri on the fermentation, chemical composition, and aerobic stability of sugarcane silage. Two databases that included 15 and 27 published articles (81 and 83 silages evaluated) were used to evaluate L. plantarum and L. buchneri, respectively. For each database, the means of the treatments compiled from the studies were classified into two categories: (a) sugarcane silage without inoculant (untreated) and (b) sugarcane silage inoculated with L. plantarum (1 x 10(5)-1.8 x 10(6) cfu/g of fresh forage) or with L. buchneri (2.5 x 10(4)-1 x 10(6) cfu/g of fresh forage; inoculated). Sugarcane silage inoculated with L. plantarum displayed increased ethanol concentration (+43.8%, p < 0.01) and dry matter (DM) loss (+9.6%, p = 0.03). In contrast, inoculation with L. buchneri increased the acetic acid concentration (+30.8%, p = 0.01), and decreased ethanol concentration (-58.8%, p < 0.01) and DM loss (-19.7%, p < 0.01). In vitro DM digestibility decreased following inoculation with L. plantarum (-5.7%, p = 0.05) or L. buchneri (-3.3%, p < 0.01). Aerobic stability was unaffected by inoculation with L. plantarum (p = 0.16) or L. buchneri (p = 0.48). The results show that L. plantarum impairs the fermentation of sugarcane silages; therefore, its utilization might not be recommended for ensiling this crop. Conversely, even with no additional gain on silage digestibility and aerobic stability, L. buchneri may be recommended for sugarcane ensiling because it reduces alcoholic fermentation and DM loss.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.relationGrassland Science
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectdry matter loss
dc.subjectethanol
dc.subjectLactobacillus buchneri
dc.subjectLactobacillus plantarum
dc.subjectsugarcane
dc.titleMeta-analysis of the effects of Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus buchneri on fermentation, chemical composition and aerobic stability of sugarcane silage
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución