dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorAgr & Agri Food Canada
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-04T19:13:08Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-19T18:17:39Z
dc.date.available2019-10-04T19:13:08Z
dc.date.available2022-12-19T18:17:39Z
dc.date.created2019-10-04T19:13:08Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-01
dc.identifierLivestock Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 222, p. 7-13, 2019.
dc.identifier1871-1413
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/186362
dc.identifier10.1016/j.livsci.2019.02.006
dc.identifierWOS:000463290800002
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5367397
dc.description.abstractThere is a large variation in nutrient requirements among pigs, and, therefore, feeding pigs individually with diets tailored daily or in groups with a single feed may require different nutrients inclusion rates. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the Met inclusion rate on growth performance, carcass quality, and nutrition health variables of growing pigs fed within an individual precision feeding (IPF) or a conventional phase feeding (CPF) system. Sixty barrows weighing 25-50 kg of body weight of the same high-performance genotype were used. A 2 x 3 factorial arrangement of treatments with 2 main factors: (1) 2 feeding systems (IPF or CPF system), and (2) 3 Met inclusion rates (70, 100 or 130% of the ideal protein ratio of 0.30 Met:Lys) was used in a complete randomized design. Final body weight, average daily weight gain, feed efficiency, Met, and Cys intake, and loin depth were lower (P = 0.01) for IPF compared with CPF. Average daily gain increased linearly (P < 0.01) with increasing Met inclusion rates for IPF and it had no effect for CPF pigs. Average daily feed intake and backfat thickness were not different between feeding systems, yet both tended to increase linearly (P = 0.08) with the increase of Met inclusion rates. Lysine intake was lower (P < 0.01) in IPF compared with CPF pigs but Lys tended to increase quadratically (P = 0.06) with increasing Met inclusion rates for both systems. Plasma urea N was lower, and creatinine was higher in IPF pigs than in CPF pigs (P = 0.01), and both linearly increased (P = 0.01) with increasing Met inclusion rates. Alanine aminotransferase was higher (P = 0.02) in IPF than in CPF pigs, and remained unchanged with the increase of Met inclusion rate. Total plasma protein, triglycerides, and C-reactive protein did not differ between feeding systems neither among Met inclusion rates. These results indicate that Met to Lys ratio is underestimated for pigs fed with diets tailored daily, and the ideal protein profile might differ when pigs are fed in an IPF system or in a CPF system.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relationLivestock Science
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectPrecision feeding
dc.subjectAmino acids requirements
dc.subjectPlasma biochemical variables
dc.subjectGrowth performance
dc.subjectPrecision livestock farming
dc.titleResponse to dietary methionine supply of growing pigs fed daily tailored diets or fed according to a conventional phase feeding system
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución