dc.contributorSecretaria Municipal Agr & Abastecimento Bauru
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorAgencia Paulista Tecnol Agronegocios
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-04T12:41:35Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-19T18:15:08Z
dc.date.available2019-10-04T12:41:35Z
dc.date.available2022-12-19T18:15:08Z
dc.date.created2019-10-04T12:41:35Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01
dc.identifierPesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira. Brasilia Df: Empresa Brasil Pesq Agropec, v. 54, 8 p., 2019.
dc.identifier0100-204X
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/186136
dc.identifier10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2019.v54.00767
dc.identifierS0100-204X2019000102101
dc.identifierWOS:000484263400001
dc.identifierS0100-204X2019000102101.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5367188
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this work was to evaluate the growth, relative chlorophyll index and nitrogen concentrations in leaves, and the grain yield of arabica coffee (Coffea arabica) fertilized with rates of N as coated and conventional urea, in a sandy soil under rainfed conditions. The experiment was carried out over three crop years, using 'Mundo Novo IAC 388-17-1' coffee, in a randomized complete block design, in a 3x2+1 factorial arrangement, with three treatments with 150, 300, and 600 kg ha(-1) N, as coated and conventional urea, and a control without N, with six replicates. Nitrogen increased stem diameter, plant height, N concentrations and relative chlorophyll index in the leaves, as well as grain yield. Over the three crop years, the highest N rate provided the greatest grain yield. Coated urea has no advantage over the conventional one, in supplying N to arabica coffee crop, in sandy soil under rainfed conditions.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherEmpresa Brasil Pesq Agropec
dc.relationPesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectCoffea arabica
dc.subjectgrain yield
dc.subjectmineral nutrition
dc.subjectnitrogen
dc.subjectslow release
dc.titleArabica coffee response to rates of coated and conventional urea in sandy soil
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución