dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorSwiss Fed Inst Technol
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-04T12:33:12Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-19T18:03:53Z
dc.date.available2019-10-04T12:33:12Z
dc.date.available2022-12-19T18:03:53Z
dc.date.created2019-10-04T12:33:12Z
dc.date.issued2018-11-01
dc.identifierJournal Of Computational Biology. New Rochelle: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc, v. 25, n. 11, p. 1257-1265, 2018.
dc.identifier1066-5277
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/185176
dc.identifier10.1089/cmb.2017.0244
dc.identifierWOS:000452242100008
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5366229
dc.description.abstractAlthough differential gene expression (DGE) profiling in RNA-seq is used by many researchers, new packages and pipelines are continuously being presented as a result of an ongoing investigation. In this work, a geometric approach based on Supervised Variational Relevance Learning (Suvrel) was compared with DEpackages (edgeR, DESEq, baySeq, PoissonSeq, and limma) in the DGE profiling. The Suvrel method seeks to determine the relevance of characteristics (e.g., gene or transcript) based on intraclass and interclass distances. The comparison was performed using technical and biological replicates. For technical replicates, we used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, while for the other ones, we used robustness analysis. From ROC analysis, we found that geometric approach had a better performance than the DEpackages. Particularly, for a reduced list of differentially expressed genes (DEG), we noticed that this method had a remarkable advantage in ranking of most DEG (with a specificity ranging from 1 to 0.8). From robustness analysis associated to biological replicates, we found that geometric approach has comparable performance to the DEpackages. We conclude that the geometric approach had a slight overall better performance than the other methods. Moreover, it is a simple method that does not make any assumption about the distribution associated with RNA-seq data set. From this perspective, the relevance of this study was to show that a simple method can provide as good performance as more complex methods.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Inc
dc.relationJournal Of Computational Biology
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectanalysis
dc.subjectdifferential expression evaluation
dc.subjectRNA-Seq
dc.titleDifferential Expression Analysis in RNA-seq Data Using a Geometric Approach
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución