Strategies to inhibit and prevent fraud in scientific research

Estrategias para inhibir y prevenir el fraude en la investigación científica.;
Estratégias para inibir e prevenir o fraude na investigação científica

dc.creatorFrança Tarragó, Omar
dc.date2014-06-15
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-15T18:23:44Z
dc.date.available2022-12-15T18:23:44Z
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/rlbi/article/view/511
dc.identifier10.18359/rlbi.511
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5356925
dc.descriptionThis article shows the increasing concern of the scientific community about the misconducts in scientific research; at the same time the main types of research fraud are characterized and some prevention and control steps of the scientific misconducts are proposed. Countries authorities, universities and institutions of research could implement those steps.en-US
dc.descriptionEn este artículo se expone la preocupación creciente de la comunidad científica en relación con las malas conductas en investigación científica; así mismo, se caracterizan someramente los principales tipos de fraude investigativo y se proponen algunas medidas de prevención y de control de las inconductas científicas que podrían ser implementadas por los países, las universidades e institutos de investigación.es-ES
dc.descriptionNeste artigo, expõe-se a crescente preocupação da comunidade científica em relação com as más condutas na investigação científica; da mesma forma, caracterizam-se superficialmente os principais tipos de fraude investigativo e propõem-se algumas medidas de prevenção e de controle das incondutas científicas que poderiam ser implementadas pelos países, as universidades e institutos de pesquisa.pt-BR
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Militar Nueva Granadaes-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/rlbi/article/view/511/280
dc.relation/*ref*/•Anonymous (2011). Aumento do plágio em produções científicas preocupa pesquisadores em todo o mundo. O Estado de S. Paulo. Recuperado de http://saude.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,aumento-do-plagio-em-producoes-cientificas-preocupa-pesquisadores-em-todo-o-mundo,692874
dc.relation/*ref*/•Bosch, X. (2007). Dealing with scientific misconduct Europe needs policies for good scientific practice and for investigating misconduct allegations British Medical Journal, 335(115), 524-525.
dc.relation/*ref*/•Bravo Toledo, R. (s.f.). Aspectos éticos en las publicaciones científicas. Recuperado de http://www.infodoctor.org/rafabravo/fraude.htm
dc.relation/*ref*/•Bunge, M. (2000). El fraude científico. La Nación. Recuperado de http://www.lanacion.com.ar/38036-el-fraude-cientifico
dc.relation/*ref*/•Christie, B. (2007). New Helpline for Those Who Blow Whistle on Research Fraud.British Medical Journal, 334(7602), 1023.
dc.relation/*ref*/•Di Trocchio, F. (2013). Las mentiras de la ciencia. Madrid: Alianza. Dworkin, T.M. y Baucus, M.S. (1998). Internal vs. external whistleblowers: A comparison of whistleblowering processes. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1281-1298.
dc.relation/*ref*/•European Science Foundation (ESF) y All European Academies (Allea) (2011). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Strasburgo. Recuperado de www.allea.org
dc.relation/*ref*/•Fang, F.; Steen, R.G. y Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academic of Sciences, 109(42).
dc.relation/*ref*/•Fernández Muerza, A. (2005). Fraude en la ciencia. Recuperado de http://www.consumer.es/web/es/salud/atencion_sanitaria/2005/08/17/144554.php
dc.relation/*ref*/•Franca, O. (2011). Ética empresarial y laboral. Los fundamentos y su aplicación. Montevideo: Editorial Magro.
dc.relation/*ref*/•Freeland, H. (2004). The great betrayal. Fraud in science. Orlando: Harcourt Books.
dc.relation/*ref*/•García, R. (2008). USP condena físicos acusados de plágio. Folha de S. Paulo. Recuperado de http://www.folha.uol.com.br/folha/ciencia/ult306u448257
dc.relation/*ref*/•García, R. (2009). Periódico científico publica dois estudos plagiados na íntegra. Folha de S. Paulo. Recuperado de http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/folha/ ciencia/ult306u561841.shtml
dc.relation/*ref*/•Jubb, P.B., (1999). Whistleblowing: a restrictive definition and interpretation. Journal of Business Ethics, 21,77-94.
dc.relation/*ref*/•Naciones Unidas (2004). Convención contra la Corrupción. Recuperado de http://www.unodc.org/pdf/crime/convention_corruption/signing/Convention-s.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/•Office of Research Integrity (1995). Guidelines for Institutions and Complainants: Responding to Possible Retaliation Against Complainants in Extramural Research. Recuperado de http://ori.dhhs.gov/misconduct/Guidelines_whistleblower.shtml.
dc.relation/*ref*/•Office of Research Integrity (1998). Scientific Misconduct Investigations 1993-1997. office of Public Health and Science. Department of Health and Human Services. Recuperado de http://ori.hhs.gov/images/ddblock/misconduct_investigations_1993_1997.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/•Office of Research Integrity (1997). Model Policy for Responding to Allegations of Scientific Misconduct. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National Institute of Health and Human Services. Office of Public Health and Science. Recuperado de http://www.onlineethics.org/cms/4629.aspx.
dc.relation/*ref*/•Pascal, C. B. (2012). Complainant Issues in Research Misconduct. Institute of Health. The office of Research Integrity. Recuperado de http://ori.hhs. gov/sites/default/files/Complainantarticle-Pascal-8-06.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/•Rhoades, L. (2000). Final Report Analysis of Institutional Policies For Responding To Allegations of Scientific Misconduct. Rockville (Maryland). Department of Health and Human Services. office of Research Integrity. Recuperado de http://ori.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/institutional_policies.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/•Rhoades, L.J., (2004). ORI Closed Investigations into Misconduct Allegations Involving Research Supported by the Public Health Service: 1994-2003. Department of Health and Human Services. office of Public Health and Science. office of Research Integrity. Recuperado de https://ori.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/Investigations1994-2003-2.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/•Rhodes, R. y Strain, J.J. (2004). The Olivieri symposium. Whistleblowing in academic medicine. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30(1), 35-39.
dc.relation/*ref*/•Schafer, A. (2004). Biomedical conflicts of interest: a defence of the sequestration thesis. learning from the cases of Nancy Olivieri and David Healy. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 8-24.
dc.relation/*ref*/•Schulz, P.C. y Katime, I. (2003). Los fraudes científicos. Revista Iberoamericana de Polímeros, 4(2), 1-90.
dc.relation/*ref*/•Steneck, N.H. (1994). Research Universities and Scientific Misconduct History, Policies, and the Future. Journal of Higher Education, 65(3), 310-330. The Danish Committees on Scientific Dishonesty (2009). Guidelines for Good Scientific Practice with special focus on health science natural science technical science. Copenhagen: Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation.
dc.relation/*ref*/•Ukrio (2009). Code of Practice for Research. Promoting good practice and preventing misconduct. London: United Kingdom Research Integrity office.
dc.relation/*ref*/•University College London (2008). Ethical Guidelines for Research Recuperado de http://www.ucl.ac.uk/archaeology/research/ethics/ethical_guidelines University of Cambridge (s.f.). Misconduct in research. Recuperado de http://www.admin.cam.ac.uk/offices/research/documents/research/misconduct_in_research.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/•University of Edinburgh (2002). Code of Good Practice in Research. Recuperado de http://www.ed.ac.uk/schools-departments/instituteacademic-development/research-roles/research-only-staff/advice/codes/research-code
dc.relation/*ref*/•University of Glasgow (2007). Code of Good Practice in Research. Recuperado de http://www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_227599_en.pdf University of Manchester (2006). Code of Good Research Conduct Recuperado de http://www.researchsupport.manchester.ac.uk/Governance/J1276_Good_Research.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/•University of Oxford (2007). Academic Integrity in Research:Code of Practice and Procedure. Recuperado de http://www.admin.ox.ac.uk/personnel/cops/researchintegrity/
dc.relation/*ref*/•University of Sheffield (2003). Good Research Practice Standards. Recuperado de http://www.sheffield.ac.uk/ris/other/gov-ethics/grippolicy
dc.relation/*ref*/•University of Sussex (2000). Code of Practice For Research. Recuperado de https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=130108-refcodeofpractice-2014-sussex-fc-amends-post-approval-final-publishedpdf.pdf&site=377
dc.relation/*ref*/•Yamey, G., (2000, January). Editorial. Protecting whistleblowers Employers should respond to the message, not shoot the messenger. British Medical Journal, 320(7227), 70-71.
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2016 Revista Latinoamericana de Bioéticaes-ES
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0es-ES
dc.sourceRevista Latinoamericana de Bioética; Vol. 14 Núm. 27-2 (2014): Bioética: entre la ética del cuidado, la solidaridad y la dignidad; 90-99es-ES
dc.source2462-859X
dc.source1657-4702
dc.subjectScientific researchen-US
dc.subjectethics in researchen-US
dc.subjectmisconduct in researchen-US
dc.subjectfraud in researchen-US
dc.subjectInvestigación científicaes-ES
dc.subjectfraude investigativoes-ES
dc.subjectmalas conductases-ES
dc.subjectética investigativaes-ES
dc.subjectInvestigação científicapt-BR
dc.subjectfraude investigativopt-BR
dc.subjectmás condutaspt-BR
dc.subjectética investigativapt-BR
dc.titleStrategies to inhibit and prevent fraud in scientific researchen-US
dc.titleEstrategias para inhibir y prevenir el fraude en la investigación científica.es-ES
dc.titleEstratégias para inibir e prevenir o fraude na investigação científicapt-BR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución