The perception of political elites and the predilection for private forms of violence: from mercenaries to military private security companies

La percepción de las élites políticas y la predilección por las formas privadas de violencia: de los mercenarios a las compañías militares de seguridad privada;
A percepção das elites políticas e a inclinação pelas formas privadas de violência: dos mercenários às companhias militares de segurança privada

dc.creatorUrueña Sánchez, Mario Iván
dc.date2017-05-30
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-15T15:28:14Z
dc.date.available2022-12-15T15:28:14Z
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/ries/article/view/2742
dc.identifier10.18359/ries.2742
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5354964
dc.descriptionThis article starts with the following question: What factors have determined the predilection of political elites for the private forms of violence throughout history? The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of economic, political, and strategic-military factors on the predilection of these elites for the alternation of private and public forms of violence. In order to fulfill this objective, a documentary analysis will be combined with the historical representations from the qualitative method, which is coherent with a constructivist theoretical approach. The conclusion reached is that the decision-making of political elites is versatile enough to monopolize or delegate the administration of massive means of coercion. This versatility has to do with combining both defensive and offensive calculations to achieve their class interests.en-US
dc.descriptionEste artículo parte de la siguiente pregunta: ¿qué factores han determinado primordialmente la predilección de las élites políticas por las formas privadas de violencia a través de la historia? Para esto se plantea como objetivo analizar la incidencia de los factores económicos, políticos y estratégico-militares en la predilección de dichas élites por la alternación de formas privadas y públicas de violencia. Para dar cumplimiento a tal objetivo, se combinará el análisis documental con las representaciones históricas desde el método cualitativo, lo cual es concordante con un enfoque teórico constructivista. La conclusión a la que se llega es que la toma de decisión de las elites políticas es lo suficientemente versátil al momento de monopolizar o delegar la administración de los medios masivos de coacción. Esta versatilidad tiene que ver con la combinación de cálculos, tanto defensivos como ofensivos, para lograr sus intereses de clase.     es-ES
dc.descriptionEste artigo começa com a seguinte pergunta: Que fatores determinaram primordialmente a inclinação das elites políticas pelas formas privadas de violência através da história? Para o qual é sugerido como objetivo a análise da incidência dos fatores econômicos, políticos e militares-estratégicos na escolha destas elites pelo revezamento de formas privadas e públicas de violência. Para cumprir com este objetivo se combinarão a análise documental com as representações históricas desde o método qualitativo, o qual é consoante com o foco teórico construtivista. A conclusão que se chega é que a toma de decisão das elites políticas é o suficientemente versátil ao momento de monopolizar ou delegar a administração de meios massivos de coação. Esta versatilidade tem a ver com a combinação de cálculos tanto defensivos como ofensivos para conseguir seus interesses de classe.pt-BR
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/xml
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Militar Nueva Granadaes-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/ries/article/view/2742/2542
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/ries/article/view/2742/2741
dc.relation/*ref*/Abrahamsen, R. y Williams, M. C. (2007). Selling Security: Assessing the impact of military privatization. Review of International Political Economy, 15(1), 131-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290701751332
dc.relation/*ref*/Adams, T. K. (2002). Private Military Companies: Mercenaries of the 21st Century. Small Wars and Insurgencies, 13(2), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592310208559181
dc.relation/*ref*/Avant, D. (2004). The Privatization of Security and Change in the Control of Force. International Studies Perspectives, (5), 153-157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3577.2004.00165.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Avant, D. (2006). The implications of Marketized Security for IR Theory: The Democratic Peace, Late State Building and the Nature and Frecuency of Conflict. Perspectives on Politics, 4(3), 507-528. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592706060336
dc.relation/*ref*/Bliss, G. L. (2002). Revolution in Business Affairs: Strategic Business Alliances in Army Transformation. Carlisle Barracks: U.S Army War College.
dc.relation/*ref*/Brooks, D. (2000). Messiahs or mercenaries? The future of international private military services. International Peacekeeping, 7(4), 129-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/13533310008413867
dc.relation/*ref*/Bruce, T. (2010). Piracy as Statecraft: The Mediterranean Policies of the Fifth/Eleventh- Century Taifa of Denia. Al-Masaq, 22(3), 235-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/09503110.2010.522383
dc.relation/*ref*/Castro, W. R. (2005). Regulating the new privateers of the twenty-first century. Rutgers Law Journal, (37), 671-702.
dc.relation/*ref*/Cicchini, J. y Herrera, R. (2008). Sociétés militaires priveés: la guerre par procuration? Le cas de la guerre d'Irak. Recherches Internationales, (8), 9-26.
dc.relation/*ref*/Cusumano, E. (2015). The scope of military privatization: Military role conceptions and contractor support in the United States and the United Kingdom. International Relations, 29(2), 219-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117814552142
dc.relation/*ref*/Duncan, G. (2006). Los se-ores de la guerra: de paramilitares, mafiosos y autodefensas en Colombia. Bogotá: Planeta.
dc.relation/*ref*/Ellington, S. (2011). The Rise of Battlefield Private Contractors. Public Imtegrity, 13(2), 131-148. https://doi.org/10.2753/PIN1099-9922130203
dc.relation/*ref*/Ettinger, A. (2014). After the gold rush: Corporate Warriors and The Market of Force Revisited. International Journal, 69(4), 559-569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020702014542754
dc.relation/*ref*/Galula, D. (2006). Counterinsurgency Warfare. Westport, Londres: Praeger Security International.
dc.relation/*ref*/Heinecken, L. (2014). Outsourcing Public Security: The Unforeseen Consequences for the Military Profession. Armed Forces & Society, 40(4), 625-646. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X13489974
dc.relation/*ref*/Klen, M. (2004). La privatisation de la guerre. Études, (401), 181-191.
dc.relation/*ref*/Krahmann, E. (2005). Security governance and the private military industry in Europe and North America. Conflict, Security and Development, 5(2), 247-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678800500170209
dc.relation/*ref*/Krahmann, E. (2008). Security: Collective Good or Commodity? European Journal of International Relations, 14(3), 379-404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066108092304
dc.relation/*ref*/Kurlantzick, J. (2003). Outsourcing the dirty work: the military and its reliance on hired guns. The American Prospect, 14(5), 17-19.
dc.relation/*ref*/Laboire Iglesias, M. (2012). La privatización de la seguridad: Las empresas militares y de seguridad privadas en el entorno estratégico actual. s. l.: Secretaría Técnica General, Ministerio de Defensa.
dc.relation/*ref*/Lavalle, T. M. (2010). Civil-Military Integration: The Politics of Outsourcing National Security. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(3), 185-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610367508
dc.relation/*ref*/Leander, A. (2007). Private Security Contractors in the Debate about Darfur: Reflecting and Reinforcing Neo-Liberal Governmentality. International Relations, 21(2), 201-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117807077004
dc.relation/*ref*/Lendon, J. (2006). Soldados y fantasmas: historia de las guerras en Grecia y Roma. Barcelona: Ariel.
dc.relation/*ref*/Mabee, B. (2009). Pirates, privateers and the political economy of private violence. Global change, Peace & Security, 21(2), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781150902871994
dc.relation/*ref*/Macías, A. (2012). The Impact of PMSC on the Role of Today's Military. Opera, (12), 221-238.
dc.relation/*ref*/Maquiavelo, N. (1985). El príncipe. Madrid: Alba.
dc.relation/*ref*/Maquiavelo, N. (2000). Del arte de la guerra. Madrid: Tecnos.
dc.relation/*ref*/Münkler, H. (2003). Viejas y nuevas guerras: asimetría y privatización de la violencia. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
dc.relation/*ref*/Ortiz, C. (2008). Private military contracting in weak states: Permeation or transgression of the new public management of security? African Security Review, 17(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2008.9627467
dc.relation/*ref*/Osterud, O. (2016). The New Military Revolution - From Mercenaries to Outsourcing. En J. Haaland Matlary y O. Osterud (Eds.), Denationalisation of Defense: Privatisation and Internationalisation (pp. 13-26). Londres y Nueva York: Routledge.
dc.relation/*ref*/Petersohn, U. (2014). The Impact of Mercernaries and Private Military and Security Companies on Civil War Severity between 1946 and 2002. International Interactions, 40(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2014.880699
dc.relation/*ref*/Policante, A. (2013). The new pirate wars: the world market imperial formation. Global Discourse, 3(1), 52-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2013.804760
dc.relation/*ref*/Schmitt, C. (1984). Teoría del partisano: acotación al concepto de lo político. Buenos Aires: Folios.
dc.relation/*ref*/Shearer, D. (1998). The expansion of the private military sector. The Adelphi Papers, 38(316), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/05679329808449481
dc.relation/*ref*/Shearer, D. (1999). Private military force and challenges for the future. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 13(1), 80-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557579908400275
dc.relation/*ref*/Singer, P. W. (2005). Outsourcing War. Foreign Affairs, 84(2), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.2307/20034280
dc.relation/*ref*/Singer, P. W. (2006). Humanitarian Principles, Private Military Agents: Implications of the Privatized Military Industry for the Humanitarian Community. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 13(1), 105-121.
dc.relation/*ref*/Springer, N. (2005). Desactivar la guerra: alternativas audaces para consolidar la paz. Bogotá: Aguilar.
dc.relation/*ref*/Thompson, J. E. (1994). Mercenaries, Pirates and Sovereigns: State-building and extraterritorial violence in early modern Europe. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Urue-a Sánchez, M. I. (2011). Leviatanes desnudos, piratas desbocados: Estados fallidos, nuevas guerras y derecho internacional de guerra. Bogotá: Universidad La Gran Colombia.
dc.relation/*ref*/Weiss, R. P. (2007). From Cowboys Detectives to Soldiers of Fortune: Private Security Contracting and Its Contradictions on the New Frontiers of Capitalist Expansion. Social Justice 34(3-4), 1-19.
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2017 Revista de relaciones internacionales, estrategia y seguridades-ES
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0es-ES
dc.sourceRevista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; Vol. 12 No. 2 (2017): REVISTA DE RELACIONES INTERNACIONALES, ESTRATEGIA Y SEGURIDAD; 67-89en-US
dc.sourceRevista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; Vol. 12 Núm. 2 (2017): REVISTA DE RELACIONES INTERNACIONALES, ESTRATEGIA Y SEGURIDAD; 67-89es-ES
dc.sourceRevista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; v. 12 n. 2 (2017): REVISTA DE RELACIONES INTERNACIONALES, ESTRATEGIA Y SEGURIDAD; 67-89pt-BR
dc.source1909-7743
dc.source1909-3063
dc.subjectPrivate military security companiesen-US
dc.subjectmercenarismen-US
dc.subjectsecurity privatization.en-US
dc.subjectCompañías militares de seguridad privadaes-ES
dc.subjectmercenarismoes-ES
dc.subjectprivatización de la seguridades-ES
dc.subjectcompanhias militares de segurança privadapt-BR
dc.subjectmercenarismopt-BR
dc.subjectprivatização da segurançapt-BR
dc.titleThe perception of political elites and the predilection for private forms of violence: from mercenaries to military private security companiesen-US
dc.titleLa percepción de las élites políticas y la predilección por las formas privadas de violencia: de los mercenarios a las compañías militares de seguridad privadaes-ES
dc.titleA percepção das elites políticas e a inclinação pelas formas privadas de violência: dos mercenários às companhias militares de segurança privadapt-BR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución