Exploring the internal policy - international policy distinction: State of the art about the debate

Explorando la distinción política interna - política internacional: un estado del arte de la discusión;
Explorando a distinção política interna - política exterior: Um estado da arte da discussão

dc.creatorJiménez Peña, Gabriel
dc.date2015-06-05
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-15T15:26:51Z
dc.date.available2022-12-15T15:26:51Z
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/ries/article/view/848
dc.identifier10.18359/ries.848
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5354903
dc.descriptionFor some theorist the conduct of states is mainly determined by its domestic features. In contrast others argue that state behavior is shaped by the place they occupy in the international system. The purpose here is to address this discussion and make a state of the art of this discussion in the International Relations as a science. Given that the literary body that explores the internal - international political interaction is too extensive, to deal with o build it, generally turn to assumptions or common ideas, five of them will be problematize in this paper, looking for how it been produced, according to the theoretical development that have built in the last years about this discussion. en-US
dc.descriptionPara algunos teóricos la conducta de los Estados está determinada principalmente por sus características internas. En contraposición, otros argumentan que el comportamiento estatal está moldeado por el lugar que ocupan estos en el sistema internacional. El propósito aquí es abordar esta discusión y elaborar un estado del arte sobre esta distinción en las Relaciones Internacionales como ciencia. Dado que el cuerpo literario que explora la interacción política interna-política internacional es muy vasto, para abordarla o reconstruirla generalmente se acude a supuestos o lugares comunes, cinco de los cuales serán problematizados en este artículo, buscando mostrar cómo se producen de acuerdo con los desarrollos teóricos que se han construido en los últimos años sobre esta distinción.es-ES
dc.descriptionPara alguns teóricos a conduta dos Estados está determinada principalmente por suas características internas. Em oposição, outros argumentam que o comportamento do Estado é moldado pelo lugar que ocupam eles no sistema internacional. O propósito aqui é abranger esta discussão e elaborar um estado da arte sobre ela na Relações Internacionais como ciência. Dado que o corpo literário que explora a interação política interna - política internacional é vasto, para aborda-lo o reconstitui-lo, geralmente se acudi a supostos o lugares comuns, cinco dos quais serão problematizados neste artigo, procurando mostrar como produzem-se de acordo com os desenvolvimentos teóricos que tem construído nos últimos anos sobre este distinção.pt-BR
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Militar Nueva Granadaes-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/ries/article/view/848/599
dc.relation/*ref*/Adler, I. (2013). Constructivism. En W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse y B. Simmons (eds.), Handbook of International Relations (pp. 112-144). Londres: SAGE.
dc.relation/*ref*/Ahluwalia, P. (2001). Politics and post-colonial theory. African Inflections. Nueva York: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203187890
dc.relation/*ref*/Allison, G. (2002). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston: Little Brown.
dc.relation/*ref*/Ames, B. (1987). Political survival: Politicians and public policy in Latin America. Londres: University of California Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Arreaza, C. & Tickner, A. (2002) Postmodernismo, postcolonialismo y feminismo: manual para (in)expertos. Colombia Internacional, (54), 14-98.
dc.relation/*ref*/Ashley, R. (1987). The geopolitics of geopolitical space: Toward a critical social theory of international politics. Alternatives 12(4), 403-434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030437548701200401
dc.relation/*ref*/Atli, A. (2011). Businessmen as diplomats: The role of business associations in Turkey's foreign economic policy. Insight Turkey, 13(1), 109-128.
dc.relation/*ref*/Axelrod, R. (1981). The emergence of cooperation among egoist. American Political Science Review, (75). http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1961366
dc.relation/*ref*/Baldwin, D. (1993). Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate. Nueva York: Columbia University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Bhabha, H. (1994). The Location of culture. New York: Routledge.
dc.relation/*ref*/Biersteker, T. (1987). Multinationals, the State, and control of the Nigerian economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781400858507
dc.relation/*ref*/Campbell, D. (1998). Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Campbell, D. (2013). Poststructuralism. En Dunne, T, Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.), International Relations theory: Discipline and diversity (pp. 223-246). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Caporaso, J. (1978). Dependence, dependency and power in the global system: A structural and behavioral analysis. International organization, 32(1), 13-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300003842
dc.relation/*ref*/Carlsnaes, W. (2013). Foreign policy. En W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse y B. Simmons (eds.), Handbook of International Relations (pp. 298-326). Londres: SAGE. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446247587.n12
dc.relation/*ref*/Cohn, T. (2012). Global political economy: Theory and practice. Nueva York: Pearson.
dc.relation/*ref*/Cox, G. & McCubbins, M. (2001). The institutional determinants of economic policy outcomes. En Haggard, S. & McCubbins, M. (Eds.), Presidents, parliaments, and policy (pp. 21-63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Cox, R. (1981). Social forces, States and world order: Beyond International Relations theory. En Keohane, R. (Ed.), Neorealism and its critics (pp. 204-254). Nueva York: Columbia University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03058298810100020501
dc.relation/*ref*/Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe. Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Davies, G. (2002). Domestic strife and the initiation of international conflicts: a directed dyad analysis, 1950-1982. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(5), 672-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002200202236169
dc.relation/*ref*/Der Derian, J. & Shapiro, M. (1989) International/intertextual relations: Postmodern readings of world politics (Issues in world politics). Lexington: Lexington Books.
dc.relation/*ref*/Deudney, D. & Ikenberry, G. (1999). The nature and sources of liberal international order. Review of International Studies, 25(2), 179-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0260210599001795
dc.relation/*ref*/Doyle, M. (1996). Kant, liberal legacies and foreign policy. En Brown, M. Lynn-Jones, S. & Miller, S. (Eds.), Debating the democratic peace. Cambridge (pp. 3-57). Massachusetts: MIT Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Downs, G. & Rocke, D. (1995). Optimal imperfection? Domestic uncertainty and institutions in International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Dür, A. y Elsig, M. (2011). Principals, agents, and the European Union's foreign economic policies. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(3), 323-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.551066
dc.relation/*ref*/Evans, P. (1979). Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Fearon, J. (1994). Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review, 88(3), 577-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2944796
dc.relation/*ref*/Fearon, J. (1995). Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization, 49(3), 379-414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300033324
dc.relation/*ref*/Finnemore, M. & Sikkink, K. (1999). International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. En Katzenstein, P., Keohane, R. & Krasner, S. (Eds.), Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics (pp. 247-277). Cambridge: MIT Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Foucault, M. (1979). Power, Truth, strategy. Sidney: Feral publications.
dc.relation/*ref*/Foucault, M. (1998). El sujeto y el poder. Por qué estudiar el poder: la cuestión del sujeto. Texto y contexto, (35).
dc.relation/*ref*/Frieden, J. (1991). Invested interests: the politics of national economic policies in a world of global finance. International Organization, 45(4), 425-451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300033178
dc.relation/*ref*/Frieden, J. & Rogowski, R. (1996). The Impact of the International Economy on National Policies: An Analytical Overview. En R. O. Keohane, R. & Milner, H. (Eds.), Internationalization and Domestic Politics (pp. 25-47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511664168.003
dc.relation/*ref*/George, A. (1969). The "Operational Code": A Neglected Approach to the Study of Political Leaders and Decision Making. International Studies Quarterly, (13), 190-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3013944
dc.relation/*ref*/George, J. & Campbell, D. (1990). Patterns of Dissent and the Celebration of Difference: Critical Social Theory and International Relations. International Studies Quarterly 34(3), 269-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2600570
dc.relation/*ref*/Glaser, C. (1995). Realists as Optimists: Cooperation as Self-Help. International Security (19), 50-90.
dc.relation/*ref*/Glaser, C. (2010). Rational Theory of International Politics: The Logic of Competition and Cooperation. Princeton: Princeton University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781400835133
dc.relation/*ref*/Gourevitch, P. (2002). Domestic Politics and International Relations, En Carlsnaes, W., Risse, T. & Simmons, B. (Eds.), Handbook of International Relations (pp. 309-328). Londres: Sage Publications.
dc.relation/*ref*/Greenaway, D. & Kneller, R. (2007). Firm heterogeneity, exporting and Foreign direct Investment. The Economic Journal, 117(517), 134-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02018.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Grovogui, S. (2006). Beyond Eurocentrism and Anarchy: Memories of International Order and Institutions. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-08396-8
dc.relation/*ref*/Grovogui, S. (2013). Postcolonialism. En: Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.) International Relations Theory: Discipline and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Guzzini, S. (1998). Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy: The Continuing Story of a Death Foretold. Londres: Routledge.
dc.relation/*ref*/Haggard, S. (1990). Pathways from the Periphery: The Politics of Growth in the Newly Industrializing Countries. Nueva York: Cornell University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Haggard S. & Kaufman, R. (1992). The Politics of Economic Adjustment: International Constraints, Distributive Conflicts and the State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Haggard S. & Kaufman, R. (1995). The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Held, D. & McGrew, A. (2003). The Global Transformations. Reader: Polity Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Hiscox, M. (2010). The Domestic Sources of Foreign Economic Policies. En Ravenhill, J. (Ed.), Global Political Economy (pp. 51-83). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Hurrell, A. (2013). Ethics and Norms in International Relations. En Carlsnaes, W. Risse, T. & Simmons, B. (Eds.), Handbook of International Relations (pp. 57-85). Londres: SAGE. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446247587.n3
dc.relation/*ref*/Inayatullah, N. & Blaney, D. (2004). International Relations and the Problem of Difference. Nueva York and Londres: Routledge.
dc.relation/*ref*/Ikenberry, J. (1988). Conclusion: An Institutional Approach to American Foreign Policy. En Ikenberry, J. Lake, D. & Mastanduno, M. (Eds.), The State and American Foreign economic policy (pp. 219-243). Ithaca: Cornell University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300007189
dc.relation/*ref*/Janis, I. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascos. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
dc.relation/*ref*/Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Kahler, M. (2000). The state of the State in World Politics. San Diego: University of California.
dc.relation/*ref*/Katzenstein, P. (1996). Cultural Norms and National Security: Police and Military in Postwar Japan. Ithaca: Cornell University Press
dc.relation/*ref*/Keohane, R. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Keohane, R. (1993) Instituciones Internacionales y Poder Estatal: Ensayos sobre Teoría de las Relaciones Internacionales. Buenos Aires: GEL.
dc.relation/*ref*/Keohane, R. & Helen, V. (Eds.) (1996). Internationalization and Domestic Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Keohane, R. & Nye, J. ([1977]. 2001). Power and Interdependence. Nueva York: Longman.
dc.relation/*ref*/Kratochwil, F. (2007). Looking back from somewhere: Reflections on What Remains "Critical" in Critical Theory. Review of International Studies, (33), 25-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0260210507007383
dc.relation/*ref*/Kurki, M. & Wight, C. (2013). International Relations and Social Science. En Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.), International Relations Theory: Discipline and Diversity (pp. 14-35). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Lake, D. (2013). Theory Is Dead. Long live Theory. European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 567-587. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354066113494330
dc.relation/*ref*/Lapid, Y. (1989). The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a "Postpositivist" Era. International Studies Quarterly, (37), 459-489.
dc.relation/*ref*/Lebow, R. (2003). The Tragic vision of Politics: Ethics, Interest and Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511491504
dc.relation/*ref*/Lebow, R. N. (2013). Classical realism. En Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.), International Relations Theory: Discipline and Diversity (pp. 59-76). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Linklater, A. (1990). Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International Relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230374546
dc.relation/*ref*/Mapel D. & Nardin T. (eds.) (1992). Traditions of International Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Mapel D. & Nardin T. (1998). International Society. Diverse Ethical Perspectives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/March, J. & Olsen J. (2002). Rediscovering Institutions: the Organizational Basis of Politics. Nueva York: Free Press/Macmillan.
dc.relation/*ref*/Martin, L. & Simmons, B. (2013). International organizations and institutions. En Carlsnaes, W. Risse, T. & Simmons, B. (Eds.), Handbook of International Relations (pp. 326-351). Londres: SAGE. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446247587.n13
dc.relation/*ref*/Mearsheimer, J. (1994). The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security, 19(3), 5-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2539078
dc.relation/*ref*/Mearsheimer, J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. Nueva York: Norton.
dc.relation/*ref*/Milner, H. (1997). Interest, Institutions and Formation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Milner, H. (1998). Rationalizing Politics: The Emerging Synthesis of International, American, and Comparative Politics. International Organization, 52(4), 759-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/002081898550743
dc.relation/*ref*/Morgenthau, H. (1990). Otro gran debate: el interés nacional de los Estados Unidos. En Morgenthau, H. Escritos sobre política internacional (pp. 99-109). Madrid: Tecnos.
dc.relation/*ref*/Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization, 51(4), 513-553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/002081897550447
dc.relation/*ref*/Oye, K. (1986). Cooperation under Anarchy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Oatley, T. (2011). International Political Economy: Interests and Institutions in the Global Economy. Nueva York: Pearson Longman.
dc.relation/*ref*/Peterson, V. & True, J. (1998). New Times and new conversations. En Peterson, V. & True, J. The 'Man' question in International relations. Boulder: Westview Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Rengger, N. (1999). Political Theory and the Problem of Order. Beyond International Relations Theory? Londres: Routledge.
dc.relation/*ref*/Rengger, N. & Thirkell-White, B. (2007). Still Critical after All These Years? The Past, the Present and the Future of Critical Theory in International Relations. Review of International Studies, (33), 3-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0260210507007371
dc.relation/*ref*/Risse, T., Ropp, S., & Sikkink, K. (1999). The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511598777
dc.relation/*ref*/Rogowski, R, (1989). Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Aligments. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Rosati, J. (1995). A cognitive approach to the study of foreign policy. En Neack, L., Haney, P. & Hey, J. (Eds.), Foreign Policy Analysis: Continuity and Change in its Second Generation (pp. 49-70). Nueva Jersey: Prentice Hall.
dc.relation/*ref*/Rose, G. (1998). Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy. World Politics, (51), 144-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100007814
dc.relation/*ref*/Rosenau, J. (1980). Pre-Theories and theories of foreign policy. En J. Rosenau, The scientific study of foreign policy (pp. 115-169). Londres: Nichols Pub.
dc.relation/*ref*/Russett, B. (1993). Grasping the democratic peace: Principles for a post-Cold War world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Russett, B. (2013). Liberalism. En Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.), International Relations Theories. Discipline and Diversity (pp. 94-113). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Shugart, M. & Haggard, S. (2001). Institutions and public policy in presidential systems. En Haggard, S., & McCubbins, M. (Eds.), Presidents, parliaments and policy (pp. 64-102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Schultz, K. (2013). Domestic politics and International Relations. En Carlsnaes, W., Risse, T. & Simmons, B. (Eds.), Handbook of International Relations (pp. 478-502). Londres: SAGE. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446247587.n19
dc.relation/*ref*/Snyder, J. (1991). The Myths of Empire: Domestic politics and international ambition. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Spivak, G. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? En. Nelson, C. & Grossberg, L. (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271-313). Basingstoke: Macmillan. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19059-1_20
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2016 De Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridades-ES
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0es-ES
dc.sourceRevista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2015): Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; 237-259en-US
dc.sourceRevista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2015): Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; 237-259es-ES
dc.sourceRevista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; v. 10 n. 2 (2015): Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; 237-259pt-BR
dc.source1909-7743
dc.source1909-3063
dc.subjectInternational political economyen-US
dc.subjectinternal policyen-US
dc.subjectinternational policyen-US
dc.subjectinternational relations theory.en-US
dc.subjectEconomía política internacionales-ES
dc.subjectpolítica internaes-ES
dc.subjectpolítica internacionales-ES
dc.subjectteoría de las relaciones internacionaleses-ES
dc.subjectEconomia política internacionalpt-BR
dc.subjectpolítica internapt-BR
dc.subjectpolítica internacionalpt-BR
dc.subjectteoria das relações internacionaispt-BR
dc.titleExploring the internal policy - international policy distinction: State of the art about the debateen-US
dc.titleExplorando la distinción política interna - política internacional: un estado del arte de la discusiónes-ES
dc.titleExplorando a distinção política interna - política exterior: Um estado da arte da discussãopt-BR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución