Reproductive and cost assessment of a seasonal breeding program with Bos indicus in tropical Mexico

Evaluación reproductiva y costos en programas de empadre estacional con Bos indicus en trópico mexicano

dc.creator
dc.creator
dc.creator
dc.creator
dc.creator
dc.date2021-04-21
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-15T14:43:33Z
dc.date.available2022-12-15T14:43:33Z
dc.identifierhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e2130
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5353441
dc.descriptionObjective. To compare the reproductive performance of postpartum and open Bos indicus cows and to study the cost effectiveness of retaining non-pregnant animals after a short breeding season in tropical region of Mexico. Material and Methods. A total of 128 Bos indicus were included, 87 postpartum cows (PP) with ≤90 days after calving and 41 open cows (OC) with >90 days open. The study was divided into three phases: 1) Estrus synchronization followed by FTAI (day 0-10), 2) Estrus detection and AI (day 11-45) and 3) Natural mating (day 46-90). For the first phase, all animals were synchronized and AI at fixed time (day 10). Cows displaying overt signs of estrus (day 11-45) were AI. Open cows during the previous two phases were exposed to the bull. Results. Pregnancy in phase 1 was different (p<0.01) for PP and OC groups, 58.6% and 34.1%, respectively. Overall pregnancy percentage over the second service was 42.5% (p>0.05). No differences (p>0.05) were observed at phase 3, average 44.2%. By the end of the breeding season, the cost of OC, was 3 times more than PP cows. Conclusions. Pregnancy rate at first phase was higher in PP cows than OC cows. At the end of breeding season, a pregnancy rate of 80% was found. Incorporation of open cows from previous breeding season was more expensive than PP cows in all phases of the breeding program. Retaining an open cow for rebreeding one year or more could not be economically feasible.en-US
dc.descriptionObjetivo. Comparar el desempeño reproductivo de vacas Bos indicus posparto y abiertas, así como evaluar el costo de retener vacas vacías al final de una temporada de empadre en el trópico mexicano. Material y métodos. Se incluyeron 128 vacas Bos indicus, 87 vacas posparto (PP) con ≤90 días posparto y 41 vacas abiertas (OC) con >90 días abiertos. El estudio se dividió en tres fases: 1) Sincronización de celos (día 0-10) e inseminación a tiempo fijo (FTAI), 2) Detección de celos e IA (día 11-45) y 3) Monta natural (día 46-90). Para la primera fase, todos los animales fueron sincronizados inseminados FTAI (día 10). Las vacas que mostraban signos de estro (día 11-45) fueron inseminadas (IA). Las vacas abiertas durante las dos fases anteriores fueron expuestas al toro. Resultados. La tasa de gestación en la fase 1 fue 58.6 y 34.1% (p<0.01), para PP y OC, respectivamente. Durante la fase 2, el porcentaje de gestación fue 42.5% (p>0.05), mientras que en la fase 3, la tasa de preñez fue 44.2% (p>0.05). El costo de una vaca OC fue tres veces más que las vacas PP. Conclusiones. La tasa de preñez durante la primera etapa, de la estación reproductiva, fue mayor para vacas PP que vacas OC. Al final de la estación reproductiva la tasa de gestación fue 80 %. El costo beneficio de retener animales no preñados después de una corta temporada de empadre no es económicamente factible para una unidad de producción vaca-becerro.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/zip
dc.formatapplication/zip
dc.formatapplication/xml
dc.formatapplication/xml
dc.formataudio/mpeg
dc.formataudio/mpeg
dc.languagespa
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidad de Córdobaes-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e2130/2980
dc.relationhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e2130/2981
dc.relationhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e2130/3343
dc.relationhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e2130/3345
dc.relationhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e2130/3344
dc.relationhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e2130/3346
dc.relationhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e2130/2986
dc.relationhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e2130/2987
dc.relation/*ref*/1. Orihuela A. Some factors affecting the behavioural manifestation of oestrus in cattle: a review. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2000; 70(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00139-8
dc.relation/*ref*/2. Galina CS, Orihuela A. The detection of estrus in cattle raised under tropical conditions: What we know and what we need to know. Horm Behav. 2007; 52(1):32–38. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0018506X07000724
dc.relation/*ref*/3. Sá Filho MF, Penteado L, Reis EL, Reis TANPS, Galvão KN, Baruselli PS. Timed artificial insemination early in the breeding season improves the reproductive performance of suckled beef cows. Theriogenology. 2013; 79(4):625–632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.11.016
dc.relation/*ref*/4. Baruselli PS, Ferreira RM, Sá Filho MF, Bó GA. Review: Using artificial insemination v. natural service in beef herds. animal. 2018; 12(1):45–52. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S175173111800054X/type/journal_article
dc.relation/*ref*/5. Diskin MG, Kenny DA. Managing the reproductive performance of beef cows. Theriogenology. 2016; 86(1):379–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.04.052
dc.relation/*ref*/6. Pérez-Torres L, Rubio I, Corro M, Cohen A, Orihuela A, Galina CS, et al. A pre-synchronization program at early postpartum might increase the chances of Bos indicus cows cycling prior to 50 days regardless of the length of calf separation. J Reprod Dev. 2015; 61(3):199–203. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jrd/61/3/61_2014-114/_article
dc.relation/*ref*/7. Díaz BR, Galina CS, Rubio I, Corro M, Pablos JL, Orihuela A. Monitoring changes in back fat thickness and its effect on the restoration of ovarian activity and fertility in Bos indicus cows. Reprod Domest Anim. 2018; 53(2):495–501. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rda.13136
dc.relation/*ref*/8. Stagg K, Spicer LJ, Sreenan JM, Roche JF, Diskin MG. Effect of Calf Isolation on Follicular Wave Dynamics, Gonadotropin and Metabolic Hormone Changes, and Interval to First Ovulation in Beef Cows Fed Either of Two Energy Levels Postpartum. Biol Reprod. 1998; 59(4):777–783. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod59.4.777
dc.relation/*ref*/9. Sinclair KD, Molle G, Revilla R, Roche JF, Quintans G, Marongiu L, et al. Ovulation of the first dominant follicle arising after day 21 post partum in suckling beef cows. Anim Sci. 2002; 75(1):115–126. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1357729800052899/type/journal_article
dc.relation/*ref*/10. Chacón J. Assessment of Sperm Morphology in Zebu Bulls, under Field Conditions in the Tropics. Reprod Domest Anim. 2001; 36(2):91–99. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1046/j.1439-0531.2001.00253.x
dc.relation/*ref*/11. Chenoweth PJ, McPherson FJ. Bull breeding soundness, semen evaluation and cattle productivity. Anim Reprod Sci. 2016; 169:32–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.03.001
dc.relation/*ref*/12. Barth AD. Review: The use of bull breeding soundness evaluation to identify subfertile and infertile bulls. Animal. 2018; 12(s1):s158–s164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118000538
dc.relation/*ref*/13. Orihuela A, Galina C, Escobar J, Riquelme E. Estrous behavior following prostaglandin F2α injection in Zebu cattle under continuous observation. Theriogenology. 1983; 19(6):795–809. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0093691X9390323W
dc.relation/*ref*/14. Bisinotto RS, Chebel RC, Santos JEP. Follicular wave of the ovulatory follicle and not cyclic status influences fertility of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2010; 93(8):3578–3587. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3047
dc.relation/*ref*/15. Nicholson MJ, Butterworth MH. A guide to condition scoring of Zebu Cattle. Addis Ababa: International Livestock Centre for Africa; 1986.
dc.relation/*ref*/16. Schröder UJ, Staufenbiel R. Invited review: Methods to determine body fat reserves in the dairy cow with special regard to ultrasonographic measurement of backfat thickness. J Dairy Sci. 2006; 89(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72064-1
dc.relation/*ref*/17. Torres-Aburto VF, Domínguez-Mancera B, Vázquez-Luna D, Espinosa Ortiz VE. Cost of the calving interval in tropical bovine production in southeastern Mexico. Agro Product. 2020; 13(7):45–51 https://doi.org/10.32854/agrop.vi.1651
dc.relation/*ref*/18. Ayres H, Martins CM, Ferreira RM, Mello JE, Dominguez JH, Souza AH, et al. Effect of timing of estradiol benzoate administration upon synchronization of ovulation in suckling Nelore cows (Bos indicus) treated with a progesterone-releasing intravaginal device. Anim Reprod Sci. 2008; 109(1–4):77–87. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378432007003971
dc.relation/*ref*/19. Sales JNS, Carvalho JBP, Crepaldi GA, Cipriano RS, Jacomini JO, Maio JRG, et al. Effects of two estradiol esters (benzoate and cypionate) on the induction of synchronized ovulations in Bos indicus cows submitted to a timed artificial insemination protocol. Theriogenology. 2012; 78(3):510–516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.02.031
dc.relation/*ref*/20. Baruselli P., Reis E., Marques M., Nasser L., Bó G. The use of hormonal treatments to improve reproductive performance of anestrous beef cattle in tropical climates. Anim Reprod Sci. 2004; 82–83:479–486. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S037843200400079X
dc.relation/*ref*/21. Ibendahl GA, Anderson JD, Anderson LH. Deciding when to replace an open beef cow. Agr Finance Rev. 2004; 64(1):61-74. https://doi.org/10.1108/00214660480001154
dc.relation/*ref*/22. Stevenson JS, Johnson SK, Milliken GA. Incidence of Postpartum Anestrus in Suckled Beef Cattle: Treatments to Induce Estrus, Ovulation, and Conception. Prof Anim Sci. 2003; 19(2):124–134. http://dx.doi.org/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)31391-7
dc.relation/*ref*/23. Larson D, Musgrave JA, Funston RN. Effect of Estrus Synchronization with a Single Injection of Prostaglandin During Natural Service Mating Effect of Estrus Synchronization with a Single Injection of Prostaglandin During Natural Service Mating. Nebraska Beef Cattle Reports. 2009; 527:9-10. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/animalscinbcr/527
dc.relation/*ref*/24. Rodrigues WB, Jara JDP, Borges JC, Fialho de Oliveira LO, Gomes de Abreu UP, Anache NA, et al. Efficiency of mating, artificial insemination or resynchronisation at different times after first timed artificial insemination in postpartum Nellore cows to produce crossbred calves. Anim Prod Sci. 2018; 59(2):225-231. http://www.publish.csiro.au/?paper=AN17466
dc.relation/*ref*/25. Palmer MA, Olmos G, Boyle LA, Mee JF. Estrus detection and estrus characteristics in housed and pastured Holstein-Friesian cows. Theriogenology. 2010; 74(2):255–264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.02.009
dc.relation/*ref*/25. Voh AA, Otchere EO. Reproductive performance of Zebu cattle under traditional agropastoral management in northern Nigeria. Anim Reprod Sci. 1989; 19(3–4):191–203. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0378432089900924
dc.relation/*ref*/26. Silva-Mena C, Aké-López R, Delgado-León R. Sexual behavior and pregnancy rate of Bos indicus bulls. Theriogenology. 2000; 53(4):991–1002. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0093691X00002454
dc.relation/*ref*/27. Molina R, Bolaños I, Galina C., Pérez E, Paniagua G, Estrada S. Sexual behaviour of Zebu bulls in the humid tropics of Costa Rica: single versus multiple-sire groups. Anim Reprod Sci. 2000; 64(3–4):139–148. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378432000002062
dc.relation/*ref*/28. Molina R, Galina CS, Camacho J, Maquivar M, Diaz GS, Estrada S, et al. Effect of alternating bulls as a management tool to improve the reproductive performance of suckled Zebu cows in the humid tropics of Costa Rica. Anim Reprod Sci. 2002; 69(3–4):159–173. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378432001001798
dc.relation/*ref*/29. Molina R, Galina CS, Diaz MS, Galicia L, Estrada S. Evaluation of a bull rotating system using natural mating: Effect on the reproductive performance of zebu cows. Agrociencia. 2003; 37(1):1–10. http://www.colpos.mx/agrocien/Bimestral/2003/ene-feb/art-1.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/30. Washaya S, Tavirimirwa B, Dube S, Sisito G, Tambo G, Ncube S, et al. Reproductive efficiency in naturally serviced and artificially inseminated beef cows. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2019; 51(7):1963–1968. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11250-019-01889-z
dc.relation/*ref*/31. Petherick JC. A review of some factors affecting the expression of libido in beef cattle, and individual bull and herd fertility. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2005; 90(3–4):185–205. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0168159104001959
dc.relation/*ref*/32. Pessoa GA, Martini AP, Sá Filho MF, Batistella Rubin MI. Resynchronization improves reproductive efficiency of suckled Bos taurus beef cows subjected to spring-summer or autumn-winter breeding season in South Brazil. Theriogenology. 2018; 122:14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.08.021
dc.relation/*ref*/33. Ferreira RM, Conti TL, Gonçalves RL, Souto LA, Sales JNS, Sá Filho MF, et al. Synchronization treatments previous to natural breeding anticipate and improve the pregnancy rate of postpartum primiparous beef cows. Theriogenology. 2018; 114:206–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.11.022
dc.relation/*ref*/34. Ibendahl G, John Anderson. Open Cow Replacement Decisions: an Application of Asset Replacement Theory. Western Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meetings. 2001. https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/36184
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2021 José Francisco Martínez-Albarrán, Carlos Salvador Galina-Hidalgo, Ivette Rubio-Gutiérrez, Wendy Leticia Balam-Villarreal, Manuel D. Corro-Moraleses-ES
dc.sourceJournal MVZ Cordoba; Vol. 26 No. 2 (2021): Revista MVZ Córdoba Volumen 26(2) Mayo-Agosto 2021; e2130en-US
dc.sourceRevista MVZ Córdoba; Vol. 26 Núm. 2 (2021): Revista MVZ Córdoba Volumen 26(2) Mayo-Agosto 2021; e2130es-ES
dc.source1909-0544
dc.source0122-0268
dc.source10.21897/rmvz.v26.n2.2021
dc.subjectArtificial inseminationen-US
dc.subjectBos indicusen-US
dc.subjectcost analysisen-US
dc.subjectpostpartumen-US
dc.subjectAnálisis de costoses-ES
dc.subjectBos indicuses-ES
dc.subjectinseminación artificiales-ES
dc.subjectpospartoes-ES
dc.titleReproductive and cost assessment of a seasonal breeding program with Bos indicus in tropical Mexicoen-US
dc.titleEvaluación reproductiva y costos en programas de empadre estacional con Bos indicus en trópico mexicanoes-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución